Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test

被引:32
作者
Marsh, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
Lozito, Jeffrey P. [2 ]
Umanath, Sharda [1 ]
Bjork, Elizabeth L. [3 ]
Bjork, Robert A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] SA Technol Inc, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Feedback; Error correction; Multiple-choice testing; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; PROGRAMMED-INSTRUCTION; INFORMATIVE FEEDBACK; RESPONSE-CERTITUDE; HIGH-CONFIDENCE; RETENTION; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1080/09658211.2012.684882
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A key educational challenge is how to correct students' errors and misconceptions so that they do not persist. Simply labelling an answer as correct or incorrect on a short-answer test ( verification feedback) does not improve performance on later tests; error correction requires receiving answer feedback. We explored the generality of this conclusion and whether the effectiveness of verification feedback depends on the type of test with which it is paired. We argue that, unlike for short-answer tests, learning whether one's multiple-choice selection is correct or incorrect should help participants narrow down the possible answers and identify specific lures as false. To test this proposition we asked participants to answer a series of general knowledge multiple-choice questions. They received no feedback, answer feedback, or verification feedback, and then took a short-answer test immediately and two days later. Verification feedback was just as effective as answer feedback for maintaining correct answers. Importantly, verification feedback allowed learners to correct more of their errors than did no feedback, although it was not as effective as answer feedback. Overall, verification feedback conveyed information to the learner, which has both practical and theoretical implications.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 653
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   FEEDBACK PROCEDURES IN PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION [J].
ANDERSON, RC ;
KULHAVY, RW ;
ANDRE, T .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 62 (02) :148-&
[2]   CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH FEEDBACK FACILITATES LEARNING FROM PROGRAMMED LESSONS [J].
ANDERSON, RC ;
ANDRE, T ;
KULHAVY, RW .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 63 (03) :186-&
[3]   THE INSTRUCTIONAL-EFFECT OF FEEDBACK IN TEST-LIKE EVENTS [J].
BANGERTDROWNS, RL ;
KULIK, CLC ;
KULIK, JA ;
MORGAN, M .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 61 (02) :213-238
[4]  
Bjork RA., 1994, Metacognition: Knowing about knowing, P185, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/4561.003.0011
[5]   Efficacy of error for the correction of initially incorrect assumptions and of feedback for the affirmation of correct responding: Learning in the classroom [J].
Brosvic, GM ;
Epstein, ML ;
Cook, MJ ;
Dihoff, RE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2005, 55 (03) :401-418
[6]   Feedback facilitates the acquisition and retention of numerical fact series by elementary school students with mathematics learning disabilities [J].
Brosvic, GM ;
Dihoff, RE ;
Epstein, ML ;
Cook, ML .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2006, 56 (01) :35-54
[7]   Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Karpicke, Jeffrey D. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2008, 34 (04) :918-928
[8]   Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (03) :604-616
[9]   The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Karpicke, Jeffrey D. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2007, 13 (04) :273-281
[10]   The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return [J].
Butler, Andrew C. ;
Fazio, Lisa K. ;
Marsh, Elizabeth J. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2011, 18 (06) :1238-1244