Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: A treatment planning comparison

被引:70
作者
Kandula, Shravan [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaorong [2 ]
Garden, Adam S. [1 ]
Gillin, Michael [2 ]
Rosenthal, David I. [1 ]
Ang, Kie-Kian [1 ]
Mohan, Radhe [2 ]
Amin, Mayankkumar V. [1 ]
Garcia, John A. [1 ]
Wu, Richard [2 ]
Sahoo, Narayah [2 ]
Frank, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Proton therapy; Spot scanning; Single field uniform dose optimization; Radiation therapy; Head and neck malignancies; PARANASAL SINUS; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; PHOTON; STRATEGIES; TOLERANCE; TUMORS; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2013.05.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies can have side effects that impede quality of life. Theoretically, proton therapy can reduce treatment-related morbidity by minimizing the dose to critical normal tissues. We evaluated the feasibility of spot-scanning proton therapy for head and neck malignancies and compared dosimetry between those plans and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Plans from 5 patients who had undergone IMRT for primary tumors of the head and neck were used for planning proton therapy. Both sets of plans were prepared using computed tomography (Cl') scans with the goals of achieving 100% of the prescribed dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and 95% to the planning TV (PTV) while maximizing cohformity to the PTV. Dose-volume histograms were generated and compared, as were conformity indexes (Cls) to the PTVs and mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs). Both modalities in all cases achieved 100% of the dose to the CTV and 95% to the PTV. Medd PTV CIs were coMparable (0.371 WIRT, 0.374 proton; p = 0.953). Mean doses were significantly lower In the proton plans to the contralateral submandibular (638.7 cGy IMRT, 4.3 cGy protons, /3 = 0.002) and parotid (533.3 cGy IMRT, 48.5 cGy protons, p = 0.003) glands; oral cavity (1760.4 cGy IMRT, 458.9 cGy protons, p = 0.003); spinal cord (2112.4 cGy IMRT, 249.2 cGy Protons, p = 0.002); and brainStem (1553.5/ cGy IMRT, 166.2 cGy protons, p = 0.005). Proton plans also produced lower maximum doses to the spinal cdrd (3692.1 cGy IMRT, 2014.8 cGy protons, p = 0.034) and brainstem (3412.1 cGy IMRT, 1387.6 cGy protons, p -= 0.00). Normal tissue V-10, V-30, and V-50 values were also significantly lower in the proton plans. We conclude that spot-scanning proton therapy can significantly reduce the integral dose to head and neck critical structures. Prospective studies are underway to determine if this reduced dose translates to improved quality of life. (C) 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 394
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Delineating Neck Targets for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer
    Ben David, Merav
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    IMRT IGRT SBRT- ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2011, 43 : 255 - 270
  • [42] Unilateral and bilateral neck SIB for head and neck cancer patients Intensity-modulated proton therapy, tomotherapy, and RapidArc
    Stromberger, Carmen
    Cozzi, Luca
    Budach, Volker
    Fogliata, Antonella
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    Wlodarczyk, Waldemar
    Jamil, Basil
    Raguse, Jan D.
    Boettcher, Arne
    Marnitz, Simone
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 (04) : 232 - 239
  • [43] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer involving the base of the skull
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (02): : S43 - S45
  • [44] Salivary Gland Volume Changes and Dry Mouth Symptom Following Definitive Radiation Therapy in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients-A Comparison of Two Different Approaches: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy/Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Combination
    Park, Seung Gyu
    Ahn, Yong Chan
    Oh, Dongryul
    Yang, Kyungmi
    Ju, Sang Gyu
    Kim, Jin Man
    Kwon, Dongyeol
    Choi, Euncheol
    Yoon, Han Gyul
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [45] A Pareto-based beam orientation optimization method for spot scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Sayed, Hisham Kamal
    Herman, M. G.
    Beltran, C. J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) : 2049 - 2060
  • [46] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs rotational arc radiation therapy: A treatment planning comparison for postoperative oropharyngeal cancer
    Apinorasethkul, Ontida
    Kirk, Maura
    Teo, Kevin
    Swisher-McClure, Samuel
    Lukens, John N.
    Lin, Alexander
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [47] Proton beam radiation therapy treatment for head and neck cancer
    Mohamed, Nader
    Lee, Anna
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 6 (01): : 59 - 68
  • [48] Late Toxicities of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma
    Lockney, Natalie A.
    Friedman, Danielle Novetsky
    Wexler, Leonard H.
    Sklar, Charles A.
    Casey, Dana L.
    Wolden, Suzanne L.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2016, 63 (09) : 1608 - 1614
  • [49] A matched-pair comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with cetuximab versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced head neck cancer
    Huang, Jiayi
    Baschnagel, Andrew M.
    Chen, Peter
    Gustafson, Gregory
    Jaiyesmi, Ishmael
    Folbe, Mitchell
    Ye, Hong
    Akervall, Jan
    Krauss, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 19 (02) : 240 - 246
  • [50] Validation of automated complex head and neck treatment planning with pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Hedrick, Samantha Grace
    Petro, Scott
    Ward, Alex
    Morris, Bart
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (02):