Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: A treatment planning comparison

被引:70
作者
Kandula, Shravan [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaorong [2 ]
Garden, Adam S. [1 ]
Gillin, Michael [2 ]
Rosenthal, David I. [1 ]
Ang, Kie-Kian [1 ]
Mohan, Radhe [2 ]
Amin, Mayankkumar V. [1 ]
Garcia, John A. [1 ]
Wu, Richard [2 ]
Sahoo, Narayah [2 ]
Frank, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Proton therapy; Spot scanning; Single field uniform dose optimization; Radiation therapy; Head and neck malignancies; PARANASAL SINUS; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; PHOTON; STRATEGIES; TOLERANCE; TUMORS; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2013.05.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies can have side effects that impede quality of life. Theoretically, proton therapy can reduce treatment-related morbidity by minimizing the dose to critical normal tissues. We evaluated the feasibility of spot-scanning proton therapy for head and neck malignancies and compared dosimetry between those plans and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Plans from 5 patients who had undergone IMRT for primary tumors of the head and neck were used for planning proton therapy. Both sets of plans were prepared using computed tomography (Cl') scans with the goals of achieving 100% of the prescribed dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and 95% to the planning TV (PTV) while maximizing cohformity to the PTV. Dose-volume histograms were generated and compared, as were conformity indexes (Cls) to the PTVs and mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs). Both modalities in all cases achieved 100% of the dose to the CTV and 95% to the PTV. Medd PTV CIs were coMparable (0.371 WIRT, 0.374 proton; p = 0.953). Mean doses were significantly lower In the proton plans to the contralateral submandibular (638.7 cGy IMRT, 4.3 cGy protons, /3 = 0.002) and parotid (533.3 cGy IMRT, 48.5 cGy protons, p = 0.003) glands; oral cavity (1760.4 cGy IMRT, 458.9 cGy protons, p = 0.003); spinal cord (2112.4 cGy IMRT, 249.2 cGy Protons, p = 0.002); and brainStem (1553.5/ cGy IMRT, 166.2 cGy protons, p = 0.005). Proton plans also produced lower maximum doses to the spinal cdrd (3692.1 cGy IMRT, 2014.8 cGy protons, p = 0.034) and brainstem (3412.1 cGy IMRT, 1387.6 cGy protons, p -= 0.00). Normal tissue V-10, V-30, and V-50 values were also significantly lower in the proton plans. We conclude that spot-scanning proton therapy can significantly reduce the integral dose to head and neck critical structures. Prospective studies are underway to determine if this reduced dose translates to improved quality of life. (C) 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 394
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) - The future of IMRT for head and neck cancer
    Moreno, Amy C.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Garden, Adam S.
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Gunn, Gary B.
    Reddy, Jay P.
    Morrison, William H.
    Williamson, Tyler D.
    Holliday, Emma B.
    Phan, Jack
    Blanchard, Pierre
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 88 : 66 - 74
  • [32] Conical beam geometry intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Schuler, Emil
    Wang, Lei
    Loo, Billy W., Jr.
    Maxim, Peter G.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (12)
  • [33] Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer
    Barten, Danique L. J.
    Tol, Jim P.
    Dahele, Max
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (11) : 6589 - 6598
  • [34] Hypofractionated radiation therapy for head and neck cancers in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Eom, Keun-Yong
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 42 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [35] Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Gu, Wenbo
    Neph, Ryan
    Ruan, Dan
    Zou, Wei
    Dong, Lei
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (08) : 3356 - 3370
  • [36] Planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Yu, Cedric X.
    Amies, Christopher J.
    Svatos, Michelle
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (12) : 5233 - 5241
  • [37] Dental management in head and neck cancers: from intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons to proton therapy
    Sabah Falek
    Rajesh Regmi
    Joel Herault
    Melanie Dore
    Anthony Vela
    Pauline Dutheil
    Cyril Moignier
    Pierre-Yves Marcy
    Julien Drouet
    Arnaud Beddok
    Noah E. Letwin
    Joel Epstein
    Upendra Parvathaneni
    Juliette Thariat
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 8377 - 8389
  • [38] APPLICATION OF CONSTANT VS. VARIABLE RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS IN TREATMENT PLANNING OF INTENSITY-MODULATED PROTON THERAPY
    Frese, Malte C.
    Wilkens, Jan J.
    Huber, Peter E.
    Jensen, Alexandra D.
    Oelfke, Uwe
    Taheri-Kadkhoda, Zahra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (01): : 80 - 88
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of proton therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Vasudevan, Srivatsa Surya
    Deeb, Haya
    Katta, Anuhya
    Olinde, Lindsay
    Pang, John
    Asarkar, Ameya A.
    Katz, Sanford
    Nathan, Cherie-Ann O.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024, 46 (10): : 2616 - 2631
  • [40] Case-Matched Outcomes of Proton Beam and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Bao, Alicia
    Barsky, Andrew R.
    Both, Stefan
    Christodouleas, John P.
    Deville, Curtiland, Jr.
    Tochner, Zelig A.
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Maxwell, Russell
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2023, 10 (01) : 1 - 12