Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: A treatment planning comparison

被引:72
作者
Kandula, Shravan [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaorong [2 ]
Garden, Adam S. [1 ]
Gillin, Michael [2 ]
Rosenthal, David I. [1 ]
Ang, Kie-Kian [1 ]
Mohan, Radhe [2 ]
Amin, Mayankkumar V. [1 ]
Garcia, John A. [1 ]
Wu, Richard [2 ]
Sahoo, Narayah [2 ]
Frank, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Proton therapy; Spot scanning; Single field uniform dose optimization; Radiation therapy; Head and neck malignancies; PARANASAL SINUS; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; PHOTON; STRATEGIES; TOLERANCE; TUMORS; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2013.05.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies can have side effects that impede quality of life. Theoretically, proton therapy can reduce treatment-related morbidity by minimizing the dose to critical normal tissues. We evaluated the feasibility of spot-scanning proton therapy for head and neck malignancies and compared dosimetry between those plans and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Plans from 5 patients who had undergone IMRT for primary tumors of the head and neck were used for planning proton therapy. Both sets of plans were prepared using computed tomography (Cl') scans with the goals of achieving 100% of the prescribed dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and 95% to the planning TV (PTV) while maximizing cohformity to the PTV. Dose-volume histograms were generated and compared, as were conformity indexes (Cls) to the PTVs and mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs). Both modalities in all cases achieved 100% of the dose to the CTV and 95% to the PTV. Medd PTV CIs were coMparable (0.371 WIRT, 0.374 proton; p = 0.953). Mean doses were significantly lower In the proton plans to the contralateral submandibular (638.7 cGy IMRT, 4.3 cGy protons, /3 = 0.002) and parotid (533.3 cGy IMRT, 48.5 cGy protons, p = 0.003) glands; oral cavity (1760.4 cGy IMRT, 458.9 cGy protons, p = 0.003); spinal cord (2112.4 cGy IMRT, 249.2 cGy Protons, p = 0.002); and brainStem (1553.5/ cGy IMRT, 166.2 cGy protons, p = 0.005). Proton plans also produced lower maximum doses to the spinal cdrd (3692.1 cGy IMRT, 2014.8 cGy protons, p = 0.034) and brainstem (3412.1 cGy IMRT, 1387.6 cGy protons, p -= 0.00). Normal tissue V-10, V-30, and V-50 values were also significantly lower in the proton plans. We conclude that spot-scanning proton therapy can significantly reduce the integral dose to head and neck critical structures. Prospective studies are underway to determine if this reduced dose translates to improved quality of life. (C) 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 394
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Proton Therapy for Maxillary Sinus Carcinoma [J].
Chera, Bhishamjit S. ;
Malyapa, Robert ;
Louis, Debbie ;
Mendenhall, William M. ;
Li, Zuofeng ;
Lanza, Donald C. ;
Yeung, Daniel ;
Mendenhall, Nancy P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (03) :296-303
[2]   Report of a study on IMRT planning strategies for ethmoid sinus cancer [J].
Claus, F ;
Mijnheer, B ;
Rasch, C ;
Bortfeld, T ;
Fraass, B ;
De Gersem, W ;
Wirtz, H ;
Hoinkis, C ;
Cho, BC ;
Kwong, LWD ;
Bae, H ;
Muller, K ;
De Neve, W .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 178 (10) :572-576
[3]   A treatment planning comparison of 3D conformal therapy, intensity modulated photon therapy and proton therapy for treatment of advanced head and neck tumours [J].
Cozzi, L ;
Fogliata, A ;
Lomax, A ;
Bolsi, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 (03) :287-297
[4]   RADIOTHERAPY DOSE-VOLUME EFFECTS ON SALIVARY GLAND FUNCTION [J].
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Moiseenko, Vitali ;
Marks, Lawrence ;
Chao, K. S. Clifford ;
Nam, Jiho ;
Eisbruch, Avraham .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03) :S58-S63
[5]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: Emphasis on the selection and delineation of the targets [J].
Eisbruch, A ;
Foote, RL ;
O'Sullivan, B ;
Beitler, JJ ;
Vikram, B .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :238-249
[6]   MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL TRIAL OF ACCELERATED HYPOFRACTIONATED INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR EARLY-STAGE OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER (RTOG 00-22) [J].
Eisbruch, Avraham ;
Harris, Jonathan ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Chao, Clifford K. S. ;
Straube, William ;
Harari, Paul M. ;
Sanguineti, Giuseppe ;
Jones, Christopher U. ;
Bosch, Walter R. ;
Ang, K. Kian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (05) :1333-1338
[7]   TOLERANCE OF NORMAL TISSUE TO THERAPEUTIC IRRADIATION [J].
EMAMI, B ;
LYMAN, J ;
BROWN, A ;
COIA, L ;
GOITEIN, M ;
MUNZENRIDER, JE ;
SHANK, B ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
WESSON, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :109-122
[8]   Intensity-Modulated Chemoradiotherapy Aiming to Reduce Dysphagia in Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer: Clinical and Functional Results [J].
Feng, Felix Y. ;
Kim, Hyungjin M. ;
Lyden, Teresa H. ;
Haxer, Marc J. ;
Worden, Francis P. ;
Feng, Mary ;
Moyer, Jeffrey S. ;
Prince, Mark E. ;
Carey, Thomas E. ;
Wolf, Gregory T. ;
Bradford, Carol R. ;
Chepeha, Douglas B. ;
Eisbruch, Avraham .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (16) :2732-2738
[9]   Effects of head and neck radiation therapy on vocal function [J].
Fung, K ;
Yoo, J ;
Leeper, HA ;
Bogue, B ;
Hawkins, S ;
Hammond, JA ;
Gilchrist, JA ;
Venkatesan, VM .
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2001, 30 (03) :133-139
[10]   Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston [J].
Gillin, Michael T. ;
Sahoo, Narayan ;
Bues, Martin ;
Ciangaru, George ;
Sawakuchi, Gabriel ;
Poenisch, Falk ;
Arjomandy, Bijan ;
Martin, Craig ;
Titt, Uwe ;
Suzuki, Kazumichi ;
Smith, Alfred R. ;
Zhu, X. Ronald .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (01) :154-163