Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: A treatment planning comparison

被引:70
作者
Kandula, Shravan [1 ]
Zhu, Xiaorong [2 ]
Garden, Adam S. [1 ]
Gillin, Michael [2 ]
Rosenthal, David I. [1 ]
Ang, Kie-Kian [1 ]
Mohan, Radhe [2 ]
Amin, Mayankkumar V. [1 ]
Garcia, John A. [1 ]
Wu, Richard [2 ]
Sahoo, Narayah [2 ]
Frank, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Proton therapy; Spot scanning; Single field uniform dose optimization; Radiation therapy; Head and neck malignancies; PARANASAL SINUS; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; PHOTON; STRATEGIES; TOLERANCE; TUMORS; IMRT;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2013.05.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies can have side effects that impede quality of life. Theoretically, proton therapy can reduce treatment-related morbidity by minimizing the dose to critical normal tissues. We evaluated the feasibility of spot-scanning proton therapy for head and neck malignancies and compared dosimetry between those plans and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Plans from 5 patients who had undergone IMRT for primary tumors of the head and neck were used for planning proton therapy. Both sets of plans were prepared using computed tomography (Cl') scans with the goals of achieving 100% of the prescribed dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and 95% to the planning TV (PTV) while maximizing cohformity to the PTV. Dose-volume histograms were generated and compared, as were conformity indexes (Cls) to the PTVs and mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs). Both modalities in all cases achieved 100% of the dose to the CTV and 95% to the PTV. Medd PTV CIs were coMparable (0.371 WIRT, 0.374 proton; p = 0.953). Mean doses were significantly lower In the proton plans to the contralateral submandibular (638.7 cGy IMRT, 4.3 cGy protons, /3 = 0.002) and parotid (533.3 cGy IMRT, 48.5 cGy protons, p = 0.003) glands; oral cavity (1760.4 cGy IMRT, 458.9 cGy protons, p = 0.003); spinal cord (2112.4 cGy IMRT, 249.2 cGy Protons, p = 0.002); and brainStem (1553.5/ cGy IMRT, 166.2 cGy protons, p = 0.005). Proton plans also produced lower maximum doses to the spinal cdrd (3692.1 cGy IMRT, 2014.8 cGy protons, p = 0.034) and brainstem (3412.1 cGy IMRT, 1387.6 cGy protons, p -= 0.00). Normal tissue V-10, V-30, and V-50 values were also significantly lower in the proton plans. We conclude that spot-scanning proton therapy can significantly reduce the integral dose to head and neck critical structures. Prospective studies are underway to determine if this reduced dose translates to improved quality of life. (C) 2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 394
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment planning of total marrow irradiation with intensity-modulated spot-scanning proton therapy
    Zuro, Darren M.
    Vidal, Gabriel
    Cantrell, James Nathan
    Chen, Yong
    Han, Chunhui
    Henson, Christina
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Hui, Susanta
    Ali, Imad
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [2] Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors
    Gu, Wenbo
    O'Connor, Daniel
    Dan Nguyen
    Yu, Victoria Y.
    Ruan, Dan
    Dong, Lei
    Sheng, Ke
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 1338 - 1350
  • [3] Proton beam radiation therapy results in significantly reduced toxicity compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck tumors that require ipsilateral radiation
    Romesser, Paul B.
    Cahlon, Oren
    Scher, Eli
    Zhou, Ying
    Berry, Sean L.
    Rybkin, Alisa
    Sine, Kevin M.
    Tang, Shikui
    Sherman, Eric J.
    Wong, Richard
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 (02) : 286 - 292
  • [4] Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer: A dosimetric comparison
    Nguyen, My-Lien
    Cantrell, J. Nathan
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    Henson, Christina
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2021, 46 (03) : 259 - 263
  • [5] Comparison of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer based on radiobiological modelling
    Nguyen, My-Lien
    Afrin, Kazi T.
    Newbury, Patrick
    Henson, Christina
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2023, 22
  • [6] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer
    Eisbruch, A
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2005, 2 (01): : 34 - 39
  • [7] Comparing the oncologic outcomes of proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Chang, Chia-Lun
    Lin, Kuan-Chou
    Chen, Wan-Ming
    Shia, Ben-Chang
    Wu, Szu-Yuan
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190
  • [8] Comparison of weekly and daily online adaptation for head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Bobic, Mislav
    Lalonde, Arthur
    Sharp, Gregory C.
    Grassberger, Clemens
    Verburg, Joost M.
    Winey, Brian A.
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Paganetti, Harald
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (05)
  • [9] Dental radiation dosimetric maps from intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning for head and neck cancers
    Polce, Simran
    Gogineni, Emile
    Antone, Jeffrey
    Ghaly, Maged
    Keith Frank, Douglas
    Segal, Joshua D.
    Parashar, Bhupesh
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2021, 43 (05): : 1428 - 1439
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic malignancies
    Ali, Arif N.
    Dhabaan, Anees H.
    Jarrio, Christie S.
    Siddiqi, Arsalan K.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2012, 37 (03) : 271 - 275