GIS-based evaluation of landslide susceptibility using hybrid computational intelligence models

被引:158
作者
Chen, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geol & Environm, Xian 710054, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Coal Resources Explorat & Comprehens Util, Xian 710021, Peoples R China
关键词
Reduced error pruning tree; Bagging; Dagging; Real Adaboost; Landslide; EVIDENTIAL BELIEF FUNCTION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; SHALLOW LANDSLIDES; FREQUENCY RATIO; CERTAINTY FACTOR; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DECISION TREE;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2020.104777
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Landslides have caused huge economic and human losses in China. Mapping of landslide susceptibility is an important tool to prevent and control landslide disasters. The purpose of this study is to make use of a hybrid machine learning approach by combining the reduced-error pruning trees (Rept) with a series of ensemble techniques (Bagging, Dagging, and Real Adaboost) and compare the performance of each combination for landslide susceptibility modeling. The combination of Rept model and Real Adaboost (RRept)is a novel application in the field of landslide susceptibility. Firstly, a landslide inventory map was prepared with 298 determined historical landslides events in the study area, 209 landslides (70%) were randomly selected for the training dataset and the remaining 89 landslides (30%) were used for validation dataset. On this basis, 16 landslide influencing factors were included in the landslide susceptibility evaluation (slope angle, elevation, slope aspect, sediment transport index (STI), topographical wetness index (TWI), stream power index (SPI), profile curvature, plan curvature, distance to rivers, distance to roads, distance to faults, soil, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), landuse, lithology and rainfall). Secondly, the correlation attribute evaluation (CAE) method was used to select the most important factors for the proposed landslide susceptibility model. The results show that all the factors contribute to the occurrence of landslide. Slope angle, Landuse, Elevation, Distance to roads, Soil and Lithology have the greatest influence on the occurrence of landslide. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC), standard error (SE), 95% confidence interval and mean absolute error (MAE) were then used to validate and compare the performance of the model. The best model should have the largest AUC value, the smallest SE, the narrowest 95% CI and the smallest MAE. The results show that the three hybrid models perform better than the Rept model alone. For the training data set, the RRept model has highest AUC value (0.927), the smallest SE (0.121), the narrowest 95% confidence interval (0.898-0.95) and the lowest MAE (0.20). For the validation data set, the RRept model has the highest AUC value (0.745), the narrowest 95% confidence interval (0.674-0.807) and the lowest MAE (0.33). The RRept has the highest predictive power for landslide susceptibility evaluation. The results show that a hybrid method improves the prediction ability of the base Rept model. In addition, the RRept model is a promising comprehensive model that can be applied to landslide susceptibility mapping.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 114 条
[31]   Identification of torrential valleys using GIS and a novel hybrid integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning and bivariate statistics [J].
Costache, Romulus ;
Hong, Haoyuan ;
Wang, Yi .
CATENA, 2019, 183
[32]   Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping based on statistical index, certainty factors, weights of evidence and evidential belief function models [J].
Cui, Kai ;
Lu, Dong ;
Li, Wei .
GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 32 (09) :935-955
[33]   Predictive modelling of rainfall-induced landslide hazard in the Lesser Himalaya of Nepal based on weights-of-evidence [J].
Dahal, Ranjan Kumar ;
Hasegawa, Shuichi ;
Nonomura, Atsuko ;
Yamanaka, Minoru ;
Dhakal, Santosh ;
Paudyal, Pradeep .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2008, 102 (3-4) :496-510
[34]   Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong [J].
Dai, FC ;
Lee, CF ;
Li, J ;
Xu, ZW .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2001, 40 (03) :381-391
[35]   Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview [J].
Dai, FC ;
Lee, CF ;
Ngai, YY .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2002, 64 (01) :65-87
[36]   A new hybrid model using step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWAM) technique and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for regional landslide hazard assessment in Iran [J].
Dehnavi, Alireza ;
Aghdam, Iman Nasiri ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Varzandeh, Mohammad Hossein Morshed .
CATENA, 2015, 135 :122-148
[37]   Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya [J].
Devkota, Krishna Chandra ;
Regmi, Amar Deep ;
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ;
Yoshida, Kohki ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Ryu, In Chang ;
Dhital, Megh Raj ;
Althuwaynee, Omar F. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 65 (01) :135-165
[38]   New Ensemble Models for Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Modeling in a Semi-Arid Watershed [J].
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Shirzadi, Ataollah ;
Shahabi, Himan ;
Geertsema, Marten ;
Omidvar, Ebrahim ;
Clague, John J. ;
Binh Thai Pham ;
Dou, Jie ;
Asl, Dawood Talebpour ;
Bin Ahmad, Baharin ;
Lee, Saro .
FORESTS, 2019, 10 (09)
[39]   Spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides using hybrid integration approach of Least-Squares Support Vector Machines and differential evolution optimization: a case study in Central Vietnam [J].
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Binh Thai Pham ;
Quoc Phi Nguyen ;
Nhat-Duc Hoang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2016, 9 (11) :1077-1097
[40]   GIS-based modeling of rainfall-induced landslides using data mining-based functional trees classifier with AdaBoost, Bagging, and MultiBoost ensemble frameworks [J].
Dieu Tien Bui ;
Tien-Chung Ho ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Binh-Thai Pham ;
Viet-Ha Nhu ;
Revhaug, Inge .
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (14)