Does Work-life Balance Affect Pro-environmental Behaviour? Evidence for the UK Using Longitudinal Microdata

被引:60
作者
Melo, Patricia C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ge, Jiaqi [4 ]
Craig, Tony [3 ]
Brewer, Mark J. [5 ]
Thronicker, Ines [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, ISEG Lisbon Sch Econ & Management, Rua Quelhas 6, P-1200781 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] UECE Res Unit Complex & Econ, Rua Miguel Lupi 20, P-1249078 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] James Hutton Inst, Social Econ & Geograph Sci Grp, Aberdeen, Scotland
[4] James Hutton Inst, Informat & Computat Sci Grp, Aberdeen, Scotland
[5] Biomath & Stat Scotland, Aberdeen, Scotland
[6] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Environm Polit, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Pro-environmental behaviour; Work-life balance; Environmental attitudes; Longitudinal microdata; ACTION GAP; TIME; CONSUMPTION; ALLOCATION; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The environmental challenges we face today have made the need to behave pro-environmentally increasingly salient. Many believe that the modern day "busyness" of life and lack of spare time have kept people from acting according to their values and behaving more pro-environmentally. This study uses microdata from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) to investigate the relation between pro-environmental behaviour, environmental self-perception and work-life balance. Pro-environmental behaviour covers 21 behaviours relating to home energy, personal transport, recycling and shopping. Work-life balance is defined with relation to the availability of discretionary time using both objective and subjective measures. The results from the regression models of overall pro-environmental behaviour suggest that work-life imbalance does not appear to affect, neither directly nor indirectly through environmental values and attitudes, pro-environmental behaviour. The main factors determining the extent of pro-environmental behaviour relate to individuals attitudes towards the environment, age, educational attainment, household income and the presence of young children. The sensitivity analysis looking at differing time demanding behaviours reveals that actual availability of discretionary time does not seem to affect pro-environmental behaviour, while the subjective experience of work-life imbalance can have a negative direct effect particularly for more time demanding pro-environmental behaviours.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 181
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]   A RASCH MODEL FOR PARTIAL CREDIT SCORING [J].
MASTERS, GN .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1982, 47 (02) :149-174
[22]   Toward sustainable consumption: Researching voluntary simplifiers [J].
McDonald, S ;
Oates, CJ ;
Young, CW ;
Hwang, K .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2006, 23 (06) :515-534
[23]   Exploring the Attitudes-Action Gap in Household Resource Consumption: Does "Environmental Lifestyle" Segmentation Align with Consumer Behaviour? [J].
Newton, Peter ;
Meyer, Denny .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (03) :1211-1233
[24]  
Peeters M., 2005, INT J STRESS MANAGE, V12, P43, DOI [10.1037/1072-5245.12.1.43, DOI 10.1037/1072-5245.12.1.43]
[25]   The time-pressure reducing potential of telehomeworking: the Dutch case [J].
Peters, Pascale ;
van der Lippe, Tanja .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 18 (03) :430-447
[26]  
Rizopoulos D, 2006, J STAT SOFTW, V17
[27]  
Samejima F., 1969, Psychometrika monograph supplement, DOI 10.1007/BF03372160
[28]  
Stem P. C., 2000, J SOC ISSUES
[29]   How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles? [J].
Thøgersen J. .
Journal of Consumer Policy, 2005, 28 (2) :143-177
[30]   Attitude-behaviour gap in energy issues: Case study of three different Finnish residential areas [J].
Valkila, N. ;
Saari, A. .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 17 (01) :24-34