Community Participation and Recognition Justice in Border Environmental Governance

被引:6
作者
Prado, Carolina [1 ]
机构
[1] San Jose State Univ, Environm Studies, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
关键词
Environmental justice; Tijuana-San Diego; Border; 2020; program; recognition justice; environmental governance; community participation; barriers to community participation; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WOMENS PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; ENGAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; BARRIERS; LESSONS; IMPACT; SPACES;
D O I
10.1080/08865655.2020.1774407
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
In the U.S.-Mexico border region, environmental governance is fractured by the multiplicity of jurisdictions that overlap and create accountability gaps for local communities. In order to understand the role that community members play in influencing this governance process, this research is focused on the types of participants in, and barriers to community participation in the Border 2020 program, an institution of environmental governance in the border region. My findings show that while the program has succeeded in being a resource for border non-governmental organizations, their reach does not include border residents who may already have less access to their governance processes. Moreover, the key barriers to participation include structural barriers for community members like lack of funds for transportation to events, and childcare/work responsibilities. Program barriers to participation include: (1) lack of services/funding to address structural barriers, (2) minimal outreach to disadvantaged communities, (3) minimal capacity building opportunities, (4) infrequent meetings, and (5) changes in task force leadership. I argue there is a recognition injustice at play in this case study of the Border 2020 program as there are key missing community members that are not being recognized as needed stakeholders in the governance process.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 377
页数:19
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Incentives for community participation in the governance and management of common property resources: the case of community forest management in Nepal [J].
Adhikari, Sunit ;
Kingi, Tanira ;
Ganesh, Siva .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 44 :1-9
[2]   Towards tailor-made participation: how to involve different types of citizens in participatory governance [J].
Agger, Annika .
TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 2012, 83 (01) :29-45
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, DEEPING DEMOCRACY I
[4]  
[Anonymous], IRISH J SOCIOL
[5]  
Barkin J S., 2003, Global Environmental Politics, V3, P8
[6]   Smallholder Participation in Contract Farming: Comparative Evidence from Five Countries [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. ;
Bachke, Maren E. ;
Bellemare, Marc F. ;
Michelson, Hope C. ;
Narayanan, Sudha ;
Walker, Thomas F. .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 40 (04) :715-730
[7]   The quality of stakeholder-based decisions [J].
Beierle, TC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (04) :739-749
[8]  
Bryson J. M., 2004, Public Management Review, V6, P21, DOI [10.1080/14719030410001675722, DOI 10.1080/14719030410001675722]
[9]   Institutionalizing participation and governance? New participative structures in local government in Ireland [J].
Callanan, M .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 83 (04) :909-929
[10]   Evaluating public participation in environmental decision-making: EPA's superfund community involvement program [J].
Charnley, S ;
Engelbert, B .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 77 (03) :165-182