Use of Advanced Treatment Technologies Among Men at Low Risk of Dying From Prostate Cancer

被引:120
作者
Jacobs, Bruce L. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yun [2 ]
Schroeck, Florian R. [1 ,2 ]
Skolarus, Ted A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wei, John T. [2 ,3 ]
Montie, James E. [1 ,2 ]
Gilbert, Scott M. [5 ]
Strope, Seth A. [6 ]
Dunn, Rodney L. [2 ]
Miller, David C. [1 ,2 ]
Hollenbeck, Brent K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Div Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Div Hlth Serv Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Div Gen Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Florida, Dept Urol, Gainesville, FL USA
[6] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Urol Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2013年 / 309卷 / 24期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LIFE EXPECTANCY; HEALTH; CLINICIAN; OUTCOMES; ILLNESS; INDEX;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2013.6882
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance The use of advanced treatment technologies (ie, intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] and robotic prostatectomy) for prostate cancer is increasing. The extent to which these advanced treatment technologies have disseminated among patients at low risk of dying from prostate cancer is uncertain. Objective To assess the use of advanced treatment technologies, compared with prior standards (ie, traditional external beam radiation treatment [EBRT] and open radical prostatectomy) and observation, among men with a low risk of dying from prostate cancer. Design, Setting, and Patients Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified a retrospective cohort of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2009 who underwent IMRT (n=23 633), EBRT (n=3926), robotic prostatectomy (n=5881), open radical prostatectomy (n=6123), or observation (n=16 384). Follow-up data were available through December 31, 2010. Main Outcomes and Measures The use of advanced treatment technologies among men unlikely to die from prostate cancer, as assessed by low-risk disease (clinical stage <= T2a, biopsy Gleason score <= 6, and prostate-specific antigen level <= 10 ng/mL), high risk of noncancer mortality (based on the predicted probability of death within 10 years in the absence of a cancer diagnosis), or both. Results In our cohort, the use of advanced treatment technologies increased from 32% (95% CI, 30%-33%) to 44% (95% CI, 43%-46%) among men with low-risk disease (P < .001) and from 36% (95% CI, 35%-38%) to 57% (95% CI, 55%-59%) among men with high risk of noncancer mortality (P < .001). The use of these advanced treatment technologies among men with both low-risk disease and high risk of noncancer mortality increased from 25% (95% CI, 23%-28%) to 34% (95% CI, 31%-37%) (P < .001). Among all patients diagnosed in SEER, the use of advanced treatment technologies for men unlikely to die from prostate cancer increased from 13% (95% CI, 12%-14%), or 129.2 per 1000 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, to 24% (95% CI, 24%-25%), or 244.2 per 1000 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (P < .001). Conclusion and Relevance Among men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2009 who had low-risk disease, high risk of noncancer mortality, or both, the use of advanced treatment technologies has increased.
引用
收藏
页码:2587 / 2595
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Comparative Effectiveness of External-Beam Radiation Approaches for Prostate Cancer
    Jacobs, Bruce L.
    Zhang, Yun
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Wei, John T.
    Montie, James E.
    Miller, David C.
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (01) : 162 - 168
  • [22] Growth Of High-Cost Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy For Prostate Cancer Raises Concerns About Overuse
    Jacobs, Bruce L.
    Zhang, Yun
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2012, 31 (04) : 750 - 759
  • [23] Kim SP, 2012, J CLIN ONCOL, V30
  • [24] Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data
    Klabunde, CN
    Potosky, AL
    Legler, JM
    Warren, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (12) : 1258 - 1267
  • [25] Clinical Results of Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large, Active Surveillance Cohort With Localized Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    Zhang, Liying
    Lam, Adam
    Nam, Robert
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Loblaw, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (01) : 126 - 131
  • [26] Using decision analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer
    Konski, Andre
    Watkins-Bruner, Deborah
    Feigenberg, Steven
    Hanlon, Alexandra
    Kulkarni, Sachin
    Beck, J. Robert
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Pollack, Alan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (02): : 408 - 415
  • [27] The ten-year rule revisited: Accuracy of clinicians' estimates of life expectancy in patients with localized prostate cancer
    Krahn, MD
    Bremner, KE
    Asaria, J
    Alibhai, SMH
    Nam, R
    Tomlinson, G
    Jewett, MAS
    Warde, P
    Naglie, G
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (02) : 258 - 263
  • [28] Assessment of prognosis with the total illness burden index for prostate cancer - Aiding clinicians in treatment choice
    Litwin, Mark S.
    Greenfield, Sheldon
    Elkin, Eric P.
    Lubeck, Deborah P.
    Broering, Jeanette M.
    Kaplan, Sherrie H.
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) : 1777 - 1783
  • [29] Outcomes of Localized Prostate Cancer Following Conservative Management
    Lu-Yao, Grace L.
    Albertsen, Peter C.
    Moore, Dirk F.
    Shih, Weichung
    Lin, Yong
    DiPaola, Robert S.
    Barry, Michael J.
    Zietman, Anthony
    O'Leary, Michael
    Walker-Corkery, Elizabeth
    Yao, Siu-Long
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (11): : 1202 - 1209
  • [30] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy use in the U.S, 2004
    Mell, LK
    Mehrotra, AK
    Mundt, AJ
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 104 (06) : 1296 - 1303