Estimating the revenue potential of flexible biogas plants in the power sector

被引:20
作者
Lauven, Lars-Peter [1 ]
Geldermann, Jutta [2 ]
Desideri, Umberto [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kassel, Dept Energy Management & Power Syst Operat, Kassel, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Chair Business Adm & Prod Managemenl, Duisburg, Germany
[3] Univ Pisa, Dept Energy Syst Terr & Construct Engn, Pisa, Italy
关键词
Renewable energies; Flexible power generation; Biogas; Unit commitment; UNIT COMMITMENT; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; DEMAND; ELECTRICITY; OPTIMIZATION; FLEXIBILITY; GENERATION; IMPACT; BIOENERGY; SCHEMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The expansion of intermittent renewable power poses new challenges: Balancing fluctuations in power supply and demand requires additional flexibility. In this work, we model a unit commitment optimization problem to investigate the economic feasibility of concepts for flexible power generation from biogas. Because the economics of flexible power generation also depend on the availability of other flexibility options, we compared flexible biogas plants in power markets with different characteristics, namely Germany, northern Italy, and the islands of Sardinia and Sicily. Using an algorithm to optimize the constrained mixed-integer unit commitment of biogas plants, we determine hourly optimal production schedules in each region based on the prices from 2008 to 2017. The algorithm helps to assess whether the investment for equipment that required for flexible electricity production, such as a larger generator and storage facilities, would have been justified by the likely additional revenue in the investigated period. Our results show that the premium that flexible biogas plants can earn over non-flexible ones has decreased significantly between 2008 and 2017 in all investigated regions. Since 2015, additional incentives have been indispensable in all four investigated regions to make the concept of producing power from biogas flexibly economically viable.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 410
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   Tight MIP formulations of the power-based unit commitment problem [J].
Morales-Espana, German ;
Gentile, Claudio ;
Ramos, Andres .
OR SPECTRUM, 2015, 37 (04) :929-950
[32]   The "German Paradox" in the balancing power markets [J].
Ocker, Fabian ;
Ehrhart, Karl-Martin .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :892-898
[33]   Analysis of the cost for the refurbishment of small hydropower plants [J].
Ogayar, B. ;
Vidal, P. G. ;
Hernandez, J. C. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2009, 34 (11) :2501-2509
[34]   Renewable Curtailment as a Power System Flexibility Resource [J].
Olson, Arne ;
Jones, Ryan A. ;
Hart, Elaine ;
Hargreaves, Jeremy .
Electricity Journal, 2014, 27 (09) :49-61
[35]   Unit commitment - A bibliographical survey [J].
Padhy, NP .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (02) :1196-1205
[36]   Towards 100% renewable energy systems: Uncapping power system flexibility [J].
Papaefthymiou, G. ;
Dragoon, Ken .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 92 :69-82
[37]   Optimization of PV-biomass-diesel and grid base hybrid energy systems for rural electrification by using HOMER [J].
Rajbongshi, Rumi ;
Borgohain, Devashree ;
Mahapatra, Sadhan .
ENERGY, 2017, 126 :461-474
[38]  
Rohrig K., 2011, FLEXIBLE STROMPRODUK
[39]   Probabilistic Load-Flow Analysis of Biomass-Fuelled Gas Engines with Electrical Vehicles in Distribution Systems [J].
Ruiz-Rodriguez, Francisco J. ;
Hernandez, Jesus C. ;
Jurado, Francisco .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (10)
[40]   A solution to the unit commitment problem-a review [J].
Saravanan B. ;
Das S. ;
Sikri S. ;
Kothari D.P. .
Frontiers in Energy, 2013, 7 (2) :223-236