Patient and Public Involvement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Evolution Not Revolution

被引:141
作者
Staniszewska, Sophie [1 ]
Haywood, Kirstie L. [1 ]
Brett, Jo [1 ]
Tutton, Liz [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Sch Hlth & Social Studies, RCN Res Inst, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Trauma Unit, Oxford, England
关键词
HEALTH-STATUS; QUALITY; INSTRUMENTS; IMPACT; PERSPECTIVE; DISABILITY; FATIGUE; PROGRAM; RESEARCHERS; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.2165/11597150-000000000-00000
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper considers the potential for collaborative patient and public involvement in the development, application, evaluation, and interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The development of PROMs has followed a well trodden methodological path, with patients contributing as research subjects to the content of many PROMs. This paper argues that the development of PROMs should embrace more collaborative forms of patient and public involvement with patients as research partners in the research process, not just as those individuals who are consulted or as subjects, from whom data are sourced, to ensure the acceptability, relevance, and quality of research. We consider the potential for patients to be involved in a much wider range of methodological activities in PROM development working in partnership with researchers, which we hope will promote paradigmal evolution rather than revolution.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, GUID IND PAT REP OUT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires
  • [4] [Anonymous], PIRICOM STUDY SYSTEM
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2000, INVOLVING CONSUMERS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2008, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199231881.001.0001
  • [7] [Anonymous], MED CARE
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2019, QOL OFF CHECKL INSTR
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2005, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Routine Use in Treatment Centres: Recommendations Based on a Review of the Scientific Evidence
  • [10] Barham Leela, 2011, Nurs Stand, V25, P42