MRI and Mammography Surveillance of Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer: Recommendations Using an Evidence-based Approach

被引:22
|
作者
Granader, Elon J. [1 ]
Dwamena, Ben [1 ,2 ]
Carlos, Ruth C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48335 USA
[2] Ann Arbor VA Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); mammography; surveillance; breast cancer; BRCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. To evaluate breast cancer screening with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in high-risk populations, including women with the BRCA mutation, using an evidence-based approach. Methods. The MEDLINE, PUbMed, EBM Reviews, ACP Journal Club, Cochrane Database MEDSEARCH, and SCOPUS databases were accessed and searched for articles up to August 2007. Articles were collected using the following terms and medical subject headings (MeSH) that applied to the focused clinical question: ''BRCA1'' and "BRCA2'' with ''mammography," "MRI," "prevention," "screening," and "surveillance." References from retrieved articles were also used to identify relevant papers. Abstracts were screened and relevant papers retrieved. Retrieved papers were graded for quality. Summary performance measures were obtained by random effects modeling of study-specific performance estimates and standard errors derived from the multiple 2 X 2 tables. Additionally, studies meeting the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine level 2b quality were reviewed. Results. In women with an increased risk without the BRCA gene, cancer detection rates by MRI were 0.011 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.003-0.019), by mammography 0.005 (95% CI 0.002-0.008), and by a combination of both, 0.012 (95% CI 0.004-0.020). False-positive rates by MRI, mammography, or a combination of both were 0.10 (95% CI 0.03-0.18), 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.06), and 0.14 (95% CI 0.04-0.24). In BRCA positive women, cancer detection rates by MRI were 0.027 (95% CI 0.015-0.040), by mammography 0.010 (95% CI 0.005-0.016), and by a combination of both 0.031 (95% CI 0.018-0.045). False-positive rates by MRI, mammography, or a combination of both were 0.10 (95% CI 0.01-0.19), 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.07), and 0.14 (95% CI 0.04-0.24), respectively. Conclusions. The data support an essential role for screening MRI in women with an increased risk for breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1590 / 1595
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Establishing treatment benchmarks for mammography-screened breast cancer population based on a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines
    Delaney, Geoff
    Shafiq, Jesmin
    Chappell, Genevieve
    Barton, Michael
    CANCER, 2008, 112 (09) : 1912 - 1922
  • [32] Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer
    Kriege, Mieke
    Brekelmans, Cecile T. M.
    Obdeijn, Inge Marie
    Boetes, Carla
    Zonderland, Harmine M.
    Muller, Sara H.
    Kok, Theo
    Manoliu, Radu A.
    Besnard, A. Peter E.
    Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M. A.
    Seynaeve, Caroline
    Bartels, Carina C. M.
    Kaas, Reini
    Meijer, Siebren
    Oosterwijk, Jan C.
    Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline
    Tollenaar, Rob A. E. M.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. T.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Klijn, Jan G. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2006, 100 (01) : 109 - 119
  • [33] Factors Affecting Sensitivity and Specificity of Screening Mammography and MRI in Women with an Inherited Risk for Breast Cancer
    Mieke Kriege
    Cecile T. M. Brekelmans
    Inge Marie Obdeijn
    Carla Boetes
    Harmine M. Zonderland
    Sara H. Muller
    Theo Kok
    Radu A. Manoliu
    A. Peter E. Besnard
    Madeleine M. A. Tilanus-Linthorst
    Caroline Seynaeve
    Carina C. M. Bartels
    Reini Kaas
    Siebren Meijer
    Jan C. Oosterwijk
    Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
    Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar
    Emiel J. T. Rutgers
    Harry J. de Koning
    Jan G. M. Klijn
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2006, 100 : 109 - 119
  • [34] Breast cancer-related lymphoedema and venepuncture: a review and evidence-based recommendations
    Jakes, Adam D.
    Twelves, Chris
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 154 (03) : 455 - 461
  • [35] Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance:An evidence-based approach
    Patrick S Harris
    Ross M Hansen
    Meagan E Gray
    Omar I Massoud
    Brendan M McGuire
    Mohamed G Shoreibah
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2019, 25 (13) : 1550 - 1559
  • [36] Patient perspective: Is intensive screening of women at high risk of breast cancer evidence-based medicine or déjà vu?
    Fairman, Kathleen A.
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2025, 21
  • [37] Breast MRI Surveillance in Women with Prior Curative-Intent Therapy for Breast Cancer
    Elmore, Leisha
    Margenthaler, Julie A.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 163 (01) : 58 - 62
  • [38] Breast cancer-related lymphoedema and venepuncture: a review and evidence-based recommendations
    Adam D. Jakes
    Chris Twelves
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015, 154 : 455 - 461
  • [39] Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: An evidence-based approach
    Harris, Patrick S.
    Hansen, Ross M.
    Gray, Meagan E.
    Massoud, Omar, I
    McGuire, Brendan M.
    Shoreibah, Mohamed G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (13) : 1550 - 1559
  • [40] Evidence-Based and Structured Diagnosis in Breast MRI using the Kaiser Score
    Baltzer, Pascal Andreas Thomas
    Krug, Kathrin Barbara
    Dietzel, Matthias
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2022, 194 (11): : 1216 - 1228