Does videoendoscopy provide three-dimensional vision in closed rhinoplasty?

被引:3
作者
Ozturk, Guncel [1 ]
Aysal, Bilge Kagan [2 ]
机构
[1] Abdi Ipekci Cad 24-4, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Babuccu & Babuccu Surg Arts, Private practice, Valikonagi Cad 14-3, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Closed rhinoplasty; Rhinoplasty; Videoendoscopic rhinoplasty; Videoendoscopy; 3D videoendoscopy; ENDOSCOPIC PITUITARY SURGERY; EXPANDED ENDONASAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Rhinoplasty is a common procedure in cosmetic surgery all over the world. Patients desire enhancement of their facial beauty by the correction of preexisting nasal deformities. Precisely performed operations lead to better results, and enhancing technical accuracy accordingly results in more successful outcomes. Endoscopy helps us visualize the closed parts of the body with the aid of an illuminated optical device. The objective behind the present case series was to bring the advantages of open and closed rhinoplasty together by using endoscopic vision systems. A total of 312 patients with unoperated nasal deformities from private practice were operated, and videoendoscopic closed rhinoplasty was performed on each patient. Postoperative patient satisfaction was assessed using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Score; the level of satisfaction was found to be excellent. In the present case series, it was hypothesized that trocar mobility under the skin flap allows virtual binocular vision that eventually leads to stereoptic depth perception. This allows virtual three-dimensional (3D) vision on the screen of the endoscope with a regular trocar. The mobility of the tip in the transverse axis created a virtual 3D appearance. Our experiences with videoendoscopic closed rhinoplasty are shared in this report. (C) 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 78
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Adamson P A, 1992, FACIAL PLASTIC RECON, P295
[2]   Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: A review and new directions [J].
Alsarraf, R .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2000, 24 (03) :192-197
[3]   Endoscopic Guided Rhinoplasty [J].
Behrbohm, Hans ;
May, Johanna .
FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 29 (02) :133-139
[4]   Open and Closed Rhinoplasty [J].
Cafferty, Ashley ;
Becker, Daniel G. .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 43 (01) :17-+
[5]   Differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches [J].
Constantian, MB .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (06) :2097-2111
[6]   Open techniques in closed rhinoplasty [J].
Cutting, Court B. ;
Culliford, Alfred T. ;
Lin, Shin-e ;
Sharma, Sheel .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 120 (07) :2121-2122
[7]  
Felisati G, 2013, ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGO, V33, P102
[8]   Secondary cleft nose rhinoplasty: Subjective and objective outcome evaluation [J].
Gassling, Volker ;
Koos, Bernd ;
Birkenfeld, Falk ;
Wiltfang, Joerg ;
Zimmermann, Corinna E. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (09) :1855-1862
[9]   Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty [J].
Hellings, Peter W. ;
Trenite, Gilbert J. Nolst .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2007, 117 (06) :985-989
[10]   Comparison of traditional 2-dimensional endoscopic pituitary surgery with new 3-dimensional endoscopic technology: intraoperative and early postoperative factors [J].
Kari, Elina ;
Oyesiku, Nelson M. ;
Dadashev, Vladimir ;
Wise, Sarah K. .
INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2012, 2 (01) :2-8