A Hybrid Approach in Future-Oriented Technology Assessment

被引:1
作者
Chodakowska, Ewa [1 ]
机构
[1] Bialystok Tech Univ, 45A,Wiejska St, PL-15351 Bialystok, Poland
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE (FTC) 2019, VOL 1 | 2020年 / 1069卷
关键词
Future-Oriented Technology Assessment; Data Envelopment; Analysis; Rough Sets; Model; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ROUGH SET-THEORY; DECISION-MAKING; DEA MODEL; EFFICIENCY; SELECTION; FORESIGHT; CHINA; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-32520-6_38
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Technology Assessment has been a growing field of study for the few past decades. Intensive work on solving the problem of proper technology assessment has translated into the development, improvement or adjustment of the method and models used in technology evaluation projects. The article aims to present a new hybrid model that uses the Rough Sets approach and the DEA method to increase the objectivity in the selection of priority technologies in future-oriented technology assessment projects. Real-data application proved that this model: (i) reduces the number of considered assessment criteria by a few times without a significant change in technology rankings; (ii) gives individual objective weights to the criteria and allows highlighting the "strengths" of each technology; (iii) from the point of view of efficiency, considers the attractiveness of the development of each technology and the rationality of allocating resources required for the development; (iv) allows the inclusion of a possible contradiction among expert opinions.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 525
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[61]  
Tohidi G., 2011, INT J MATH MOD COMP, V1, P257
[62]   A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment [J].
Tran, Thien A. ;
Daim, Tugrul .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2008, 75 (09) :1396-1405
[63]  
Tsai Y.-H., 2009, IEEE INT C FUZZ SYST, V1-3, P439
[64]   Knowledge investments, business R&D and innovativeness of countries: A qualitative meta-analytic comparison [J].
van Hemert, Patricia ;
Nijkamp, Peter .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2010, 77 (03) :369-384
[65]   Mining the R&D innovation performance processes for high-tech firms based on rough set theory [J].
Wang, Chun-Hsien ;
Chin, Yang-Chieh ;
Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung .
TECHNOVATION, 2010, 30 (7-8) :447-458
[66]   EVALUATION OF CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES IN CHINA: BASED ON ROUGH SET THEORY [J].
Wang, Xingyuan ;
Jia, Fan ;
Wang, Yutao .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 26 (6-7) :985-995
[67]   A hybrid approach to develop an analytical model for enhancing the service quality of e-learning [J].
Wu, Hung-Yi ;
Lin, Hsin-Yu .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (04) :1318-1338
[68]   Rough data envelopment analysis and its application to supply chain performance evaluation [J].
Xu, Jiuping ;
Li, Bin ;
Wu, Desheng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 122 (02) :628-638
[69]   A hybrid approach using two-level SOM and combined AHP rating and AHP/DEA-AR method for selecting optimal promising emerging technology [J].
Yu, Peng ;
Lee, Jang Hee .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (01) :300-314
[70]   A developed fuzzy-stochastic optimization for coordinating human activity and eco-environmental protection in a regional wetland ecosystem under uncertainties [J].
Zeng, X. T. ;
Huang, G. H. ;
Yang, X. L. ;
Wang, X. ;
Fu, H. ;
Li, Y. P. ;
Li, Z. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 97 :207-230