Relativism and Bound Predicates of Personal Taste: An Answer to Schaffer's Argument from Binding

被引:3
作者
Zeman, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, Dept Linguist & Basque Studies, Vitoria 01006, Spain
关键词
DISAGREEMENT; DEPENDENCE; CONTEXT; TRUTH;
D O I
10.1111/1746-8361.12097
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In this paper I put forward and substantiate a possible defensive move on behalf of the relativist about predicates of personal taste that can be used to block a recent contextualist argument raised against the view: the argument from binding' proposed in Schaffer (). The move consists in adopting Recanati's (; ) variadic functions apparatus and applying it to predicates of personal taste like tasty' and experiencer phrases like for John'. I substantiate the account in a basic relativistic framework and reply to several objections to the variadic-functions approach in general and to its application to the expressions at hand.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 183
页数:29
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1989, Themes from Kaplan
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, PERSPECTIVAL THOUGHT, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199230532.001.0001
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, Literal Meaning
  • [5] Barwise J., 1989, SITUATION LOGIC
  • [6] Cappelen H, 2007, ANALYSIS, V67, P95
  • [7] Cappelen Herman., 2009, Relativism and Monadic Truth
  • [8] Cappelen Herman., 2008, Relative Truth, P265, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199234950.003.0012
  • [9] Elbourne PD, 2005, CURR STUD LINGUIST, P1
  • [10] García MJG, 2008, REV JURD CASTILLA LE, P129