INCORPORATING LOW-DOSE EPIDEMIOLOGY DATA IN A CHLORPYRIFOS RISK ASSESSMENT

被引:0
|
作者
Goodman, Julie E. [1 ]
Prueitt, Robyn L. [1 ]
Rhomberg, Lorenz R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gradient, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
DOSE-RESPONSE | 2013年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
chlorpyrifos; neurodevelopment; risk assessment; epidemiology; acetylcholinesterase; ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDE EXPOSURE; HYPOTHESIS-BASED WEIGHT; BIRTH OUTCOMES; INSECTICIDE CHLORPYRIFOS; RAT; METABOLITES; CHILDREN; PHARMACOKINETICS; NEURODEVELOPMENT; POPULATION;
D O I
10.2203/dose-response.12-022.Goodman
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
USEPA assessed whether epidemiology data suggest that fetal or early-life chlorpyrifos exposure causes neurodevelopmental effects and, if so, whether they occur at exposures below those causing the current most sensitive endpoint, 10% inhibition of blood acetylcholinesterase (AChE). We previously conducted a hypothesis-based weight-of-evidence analysis and found that a proposed causal association between chlorpyrifos exposure and neurodevelopmental effects in the absence of AChE inhibition does not have a substantial basis in existing animal or in vitro studies, and there is no plausible basis for invoking such effects in humans at their far lower exposure levels. The epidemiology studies fail to show consistent patterns; the few associations are likely attributable to alternative explanations. Human data are inappropriate for a dose-response assessment because biomarkers were only measured at one time point, may reflect exposure to other pesticides, and many values are at or below limits of quantification. When considered with pharmacokinetic data, however, these biomarkers provide information on exposure levels relative to those in experimental studies and indicate a margin of exposure of at least 1,000. Because animal data take into account the most sensitive lifestages, the use of AChE inhibition as a regulatory endpoint is protective of adverse effects in sensitive populations.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 219
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INCORPORATING CLINICAL RISK INTO BIOMARKER-BASED ASSESSMENT USED AS PRESCREENING PRIOR TO LOW-DOSE CT LUNG CANCER SCREENING
    Bach, Peter B.
    Trivedi, Niti U.
    Zong, Yuhua Y. Z.
    Scharpf, Robert B.
    Maddala, Tara
    Jakubowski, Debbie
    CHEST, 2022, 162 (04) : 1637A - 1638A
  • [22] Confidence bands for low-dose risk estimation with quantal response data
    Al-Saidy, OM
    Piegorsch, WW
    West, RW
    Nitcheva, DK
    BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (04) : 1056 - 1062
  • [23] Simultaneous confidence bands for low-dose risk estimation with quantal data
    Peng, Jianan
    Robichaud, Megan
    Alsubie, Abdelaziz Q.
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 57 (01) : 27 - 38
  • [25] LOW-DOSE RADIATION EPIDEMIOLOGY STUDIES: STATUS AND ISSUES
    Shore, Roy E.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2009, 97 (05): : 481 - 486
  • [26] Assessment of low-dose ethanol in food
    Reimann, H.
    Zimmermann, B.
    Lassek, E.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 368 : S271 - S271
  • [27] Conclusions and Suggestions on Low-Dose and Low-Dose Rate Radiation Risk Estimation Methodology
    Sakai, Kazuo
    Yamada, Yutaka
    Yoshida, Kazuo
    Yoshinaga, Shinji
    Sato, Kaoru
    Ogata, Hiromitsu
    Iwasaki, Toshiyasu
    Kudo, Shin'ichi
    Asada, Yasuki
    Kawaguchi, Isao
    Haeno, Hiroshi
    Sasaki, Michiya
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION PROTECTION AND RESEARCH, 2021, 46 (01): : 14 - 23
  • [28] RISK FROM LOW-DOSE EXPOSURES
    VONBORSTEL, RC
    SCIENCE, 1994, 266 (5188) : 1144 - 1145
  • [29] Low dose mixture effects of endocrine disrupters: implications for risk assessment and epidemiology
    Kortenkamp, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2008, 31 (02): : 233 - 237
  • [30] Issues in exposure and dose assessment for epidemiology and risk assessment
    Smith, TJ
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (06): : 1267 - 1293