A double standard for "Hooking Up": How far have we come toward gender equality?

被引:113
作者
Allison, Rachel [1 ]
Risman, Barbara J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Sociol, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
Hooking up; Gender; Sexual double standard; Sexual attitudes; SEXUAL DOUBLE-STANDARD; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; ATHLETIC PARTICIPATION; FRATERNITY MEMBERSHIP; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR; RAPE; MEN; PERMISSIVENESS; EXPLORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
While sexual attitudes have liberalized in the past half century, research is mixed as to whether attitudes have become less gendered over time. Recent studies on college students' sexual and romantic relationships suggest that a sexual double standard continues to organize sexuality on many campuses. Data from the Online College Social Life Survey shed light on students' evaluation of casual sex, or "hooking up." In addition to exploring gendered attitudinal patterns, we use gender structure theory to explore how individual characteristics and normative expectations of campus group affiliations shape attitudes. While three quarters of students do not hold different standards for men and women's hooking up, attitudes are more conservative than liberal, with almost half of students losing respect for men and women who hook up "a lot." However, men are more likely to hold a traditional double standard, while women are more likely to espouse egalitarian conservative attitudes. Individual characteristics, including age, religion, race, social class and sexual orientation are frequently related to sexual attitudes, as are number of hook ups, fraternity/sorority affiliation and varsity athletic participation. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1206
页数:16
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Ethnic Differences in Sexual Attitudes of US College Students: Gender, Acculturation, and Religiosity Factors [J].
Ahrold, Tierney K. ;
Meston, Cindy M. .
ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2010, 39 (01) :190-202
[2]  
Armstrong E. A., 2010, FAMILIES THEY REALLY
[3]   Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape [J].
Armstrong, Elizabeth A. ;
Hamilton, Laura ;
Sweeney, Brian .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 2006, 53 (04) :483-499
[4]   Accounting for Women's Orgasm and Sexual Enjoyment in College Hookups and Relationships [J].
Armstrong, Elizabeth A. ;
England, Paula ;
Fogarty, Alison C. K. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 77 (03) :435-462
[5]   Fraternity membership, the display of degrading sexual images of women, and rape myth acceptance [J].
Bleecker, ET ;
Murnen, SK .
SEX ROLES, 2005, 53 (7-8) :487-493
[6]  
Boeringer Scot B, 1999, Violence Against Women, V5, P81, DOI 10.1177/10778019922181167
[7]  
Bogle K.A., 2008, HOOKING SEX DATING R
[8]   Fraternities and collegiate rape culture - Why are some fraternities more dangerous places for women [J].
Boswell, AA ;
Spade, JZ .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 1996, 10 (02) :133-147
[9]   To Hook Up or Date: Which Gender Benefits? [J].
Bradshaw, Carolyn ;
Kahn, Arnold S. ;
Saville, Bryan K. .
SEX ROLES, 2010, 62 (9-10) :661-669
[10]   "Hooking Up" at College: Does Religion Make a Difference? [J].
Burdette, Amy M. ;
Ellison, Christopher G. ;
Hill, Terrence D. ;
Glenn, Norval D. .
JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION, 2009, 48 (03) :535-551