Automating the medication regimen complexity index

被引:57
作者
McDonald, Margaret V. [1 ]
Peng, Timothy R. [1 ]
Sridharan, Sridevi [1 ]
Foust, Janice B. [2 ]
Kogan, Polina [3 ]
Pezzin, Liliana E. [4 ,5 ]
Feldman, Penny H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Visiting Nurse Serv New York, Ctr Home Care Policy & Res, New York, NY 10001 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[3] Visiting Nurse Serv New York, VNSNY CHOICE, New York, NY 10001 USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, Madison, WI USA
[5] Med Coll Wisconsin, Hlth Policy Inst, Madison, WI USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VALIDATION; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001272
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective To adapt and automate the medication regimen complexity index (MRCI) within the structure of a commercial medication database in the post-acute home care setting. Materials and Methods In phase 1, medication data from 89 645 electronic health records were abstracted to line up with the components of the MRCI: dosage form, dosing frequency, and additional administrative directions. A committee reviewed output to assign index weights and determine necessary adaptations. In phase 2 we examined the face validity of the modified MRCI through analysis of automatic tabulations and descriptive statistics. Results The mean number of medications per patient record was 7.6 (SD 3.8); mean MRCI score was 16.1 (SD 9.0). The number of medications and MRCI were highly associated, but there was a wide range of MRCI scores for each number of medications. Most patients (55%) were taking only oral medications in tablet/capsule form, although 16% had regimens with three or more medications with different routes/forms. The biggest contributor to the MRCI score was dosing frequency (mean 11.9). Over 36% of patients needed to remember two or more special instructions (eg, take on alternate days, dissolve). Discussion Medication complexity can be tabulated through an automated process with some adaptation for local organizational systems. The MRCI provides a more nuanced way of measuring and assessing complexity than a simple medication count. Conclusions An automated MRCI may help to identify patients who are at higher risk of adverse events, and could potentially be used in research and clinical decision support to improve medication management and patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 505
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, METHODS GUIDE EFFECT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action, DOI DOI 10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMM.321-324.1779
  • [3] Quantifying home medication regimen changes and quality of life in patients receiving nocturnal home hemodialysis
    Cardone, Katie E.
    Manley, Harold J.
    Grabe, Darren W.
    Meola, Shari
    Hoy, Christopher D.
    Bailie, George R.
    [J]. HEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 15 (02) : 234 - 242
  • [4] Melchiors AC, 2007, ARQ BRAS CARDIOL, V89, P210, DOI 10.1590/S0066-782X2007001600001
  • [5] Conn V S, 1991, Image J Nurs Sch, V23, P231, DOI 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00677.x
  • [6] Effects of a pharmacotherapy follow-up in community pharmacies on type 2 diabetes patients in Brazil
    Correr, Cassyano Januario
    Melchiors, Ana Carolina
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2011, 33 (02) : 273 - 280
  • [7] Corsonello Andrea, 2009, Ther Clin Risk Manag, V5, P209
  • [8] Association between drug prescribing and quality of life in primary care
    Froehlich, Samanta E.
    Zaccolo, Anamaria V.
    da Silva, Sabrina L. C.
    Mengue, Sotero S.
    [J]. PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2010, 32 (06): : 744 - 751
  • [9] Development and validation of the medication regimen complexity index
    George, J
    Phun, YT
    Bailey, MJ
    Kong, DCM
    Stewart, K
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 38 (09) : 1369 - 1376
  • [10] Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes
    Gnjidic, Danijela
    Hilmer, Sarah N.
    Blyth, Fiona M.
    Naganathan, Vasi
    Waite, Louise
    Seibel, Markus J.
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Cumming, Robert G.
    Handelsman, David J.
    Le Couteur, David G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (09) : 989 - 995