Pricing and market entry decisions in personalized medicine

被引:3
作者
Luetkemeyer, Daniel [1 ]
Heese, H. Sebastian [2 ]
Wuttke, David A. [3 ]
Gernert, Andreas K. [4 ]
机构
[1] EBS Univ, EBS Business Sch, Burgstr 5, D-65375 Oestrich Winkel, Germany
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Poole Coll Management, 2801 Founders Dr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, TUM Campus Heilbronn,Bldg Campus 9, D-74076 Heilbronn, Germany
[4] Kuhne Logist Univ, Grossler Grasbrook 7, D-20457 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Personalized medicine; New product development; Competition; Game theory; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; CO-DEVELOPMENT; SUPPLIER INTEGRATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; OPTIONS; IMPACT; MANUFACTURERS; DIAGNOSTICS; DRUG; GAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108584
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the pharmaceutical industry, personalized medicine is increasingly replacing the traditional blockbuster drug concept. Personalized medicine consists of a targeted drug that is only prescribed if a companion diagnostic test detects the corresponding biomarker. This concept promises improved treatments of various diseases. However, personalized medicine also presents pharmaceutical firms with new challenges resulting from interdependencies in the drug and diagnostic test development processes. Although pharmaceutical firms generally benefit from competition among diagnostic firms, the threat of substitutes from competitors could cause diagnostic firms to step back from new product development in the first place, leading to lost revenues for the pharmaceutical firm. We consider a pharmaceutical firm that may inform two competing differentiated diagnostic firms about a drug under development, such that these firms can develop a corresponding diagnostic test. We show which diagnostic firm the pharmaceutical firm should inform first and how granting early exclusivity to a single diagnostic firm can maximize pharmaceutical profits from personalized medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]   On price competition with complementary goods [J].
Gabszewicz, J ;
Sonnac, N ;
Wauthy, X .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2001, 70 (03) :431-437
[22]  
Gawer A, 2007, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V16, P1
[23]   The impact of supplier integration on customer integration and new product performance: The mediating role of manufacturing flexibility under trust theory [J].
He, Yuanqiong ;
Lai, Kin Keung ;
Sun, Hongyi ;
Chen, Yun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 147 :260-270
[24]   The drug diagnostic co-development concept paper - Commentary from the 3rd FDA-DIA-PWG-PhRMA-BIO Pharmacogenomics Workshop [J].
Hinman, L. M. ;
Huang, S-M ;
Hackett, J. ;
Koch, W. H. ;
Love, P. Y. ;
Pennello, G. ;
Torres-Cabassa, A. ;
Webster, C. .
PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL, 2006, 6 (06) :375-380
[25]   Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development [J].
Hoyer, Wayne D. ;
Chandy, Rajesh ;
Dorotic, Matilda ;
Krafft, Manfred ;
Singh, Siddharth S. .
JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH, 2010, 13 (03) :283-296
[26]  
Jing Li, 2016, International Journal of Product Development, V21, P175
[27]   Knowledge integration using product R&D outsourcing in biotechnology [J].
Kamuriwo, Dzidziso Samuel ;
Baden-Fuller, Charles .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (05) :1031-1045
[29]   Customer involvement in new product development A relationship marketing perspective [J].
Lagrosen, Stefan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 8 (04) :424-+
[30]   An analysis of technology licensing and parallel importation under different market structures [J].
Li, Hai ;
Qing, Qiankai ;
Wang, Juan ;
Hong, Xianpei .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 289 (01) :132-143