Is trust in artificial intelligence systems related to user personality? Review of empirical evidence and future research directions

被引:25
|
作者
Riedl, Rene [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Appl Sci Upper Austria, Sch Business & Management, Digital Business Inst, Wehrgrabengasse 1-3, A-4400 Steyr, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Business Informat Informat Engn, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
关键词
Artificial Intelligence (AI); Big Five traits; Machine learning (ML); Personality; Review; Trust; Trust propensity; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; SCIENCE RESEARCH; EXTERNAL CONTROL; 5-FACTOR MODEL; DESIGN SCIENCE; SELF-EFFICACY; AUTOMATION; ACCEPTANCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s12525-022-00594-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to technologies which support the execution of tasks normally requiring human intelligence (e.g., visual perception, speech recognition, or decision-making). Examples for AI systems are chatbots, robots, or autonomous vehicles, all of which have become an important phenomenon in the economy and society. Determining which AI system to trust and which not to trust is critical, because such systems carry out tasks autonomously and influence human-decision making. This growing importance of trust in AI systems has paralleled another trend: the increasing understanding that user personality is related to trust, thereby affecting the acceptance and adoption of AI systems. We developed a framework of user personality and trust in AI systems which distinguishes universal personality traits (e.g., Big Five), specific personality traits (e.g., propensity to trust), general behavioral tendencies (e.g., trust in a specific AI system), and specific behaviors (e.g., adherence to the recommendation of an AI system in a decision-making context). Based on this framework, we reviewed the scientific literature. We analyzed N = 58 empirical studies published in various scientific disciplines and developed a "big picture" view, revealing significant relationships between personality traits and trust in AI systems. However, our review also shows several unexplored research areas. In particular, it was found that prescriptive knowledge about how to design trustworthy AI systems as a function of user personality lags far behind descriptive knowledge about the use and trust effects of AI systems. Based on these findings, we discuss possible directions for future research, including adaptive systems as focus of future design science research.
引用
收藏
页码:2021 / 2051
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficient Automated Processing of the Unstructured Documents Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Directions
    Baviskar, Dipali
    Ahirrao, Swati
    Potdar, Vidyasagar
    Kotecha, Ketan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 72894 - 72936
  • [22] Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research
    Lyons, Sean
    Kuron, Lisa
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 : S139 - S157
  • [23] Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Automation, Robotics, Future of Work and Future of Humanity: A Review and Research Agenda
    Wang, Weiyu
    Siau, Keng
    JOURNAL OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 30 (01) : 61 - 79
  • [24] Artificial intelligence for digital sustainability: An insight into domain-specific research and future directions
    Pan, Shan L.
    Nishant, Rohit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 72
  • [25] SCCT Research in the International Context: Empirical Evidence, Future Directions, and Practical Implications
    Sheu, Hung-Bin
    Bordon, Jennifer J.
    JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2017, 25 (01) : 58 - 74
  • [26] Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Scoping Review
    Preiksaitis, Carl
    Rose, Christian
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 9
  • [27] Artificial Intelligence and Project Management: Empirical Overview, State of the Art, and Guidelines for Future Research
    Mueller, Ralf
    Locatelli, Giorgio
    Holzmann, Vered
    Nilsson, Marly
    Sagay, Temisan
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 55 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [28] ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH: REVIEW, SYNTHESIS, AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
    Roberts, Nicholas
    Galluch, Pamela S.
    Dinger, Michael
    Grover, Varun
    MIS QUARTERLY, 2012, 36 (02) : 625 - 648
  • [29] Artificial intelligence for flood risk management: A comprehensive state-of-the-art review and future directions
    Liu, Zhewei
    Coleman, Natalie
    Patrascu, Flavia Ioana
    Yin, Kai
    Li, Xiangpeng
    Mostafavi, Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2025, 117
  • [30] Face Liveness Detection Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Directions
    Khairnar, Smita
    Gite, Shilpa
    Kotecha, Ketan
    Thepade, Sudeep D.
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2023, 7 (01)