A Comparison of Producer Gas, Biochar, and Activated Carbon from Two Distributed Scale Thermochemical Conversion Systems Used to Process Forest Biomass

被引:60
作者
Anderson, Nathaniel [1 ]
Jones, J. Greg [1 ]
Page-Dumroese, Deborah [2 ]
McCollum, Daniel [3 ]
Baker, Stephen [4 ]
Loeffler, Daniel [5 ]
Chung, Woodam [5 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, USDA, Missoula, MT 59807 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, USDA, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, USDA, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[4] US Forest Serv, Missoula Fire Sci Lab, USDA, Missoula, MT 59808 USA
[5] Univ Montana, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
pyrolysis; gasification; biomass; biochar; activated carbon; synthesis gas; FAST PYROLYSIS; GASIFICATION; WOOD; COAL; SOIL; TECHNOLOGIES; TORREFACTION; GENERATION; EXPERIENCE; BIOENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/en6010164
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Thermochemical biomass conversion systems have the potential to produce heat, power, fuels and other products from forest biomass at distributed scales that meet the needs of some forest industry facilities. However, many of these systems have not been deployed in this sector and the products they produce from forest biomass have not been adequately described or characterized with regards to chemical properties, possible uses, and markets. This paper characterizes the producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon of a 700 kg h(-1) prototype gasification system and a 225 kg h(-1) pyrolysis system used to process coniferous sawmill and forest residues. Producer gas from sawmill residues processed with the gasifier had higher energy content than gas from forest residues, with averages of 12.4 MJ m(-3) and 9.8 MJ m(-3), respectively. Gases from the pyrolysis system averaged 1.3 MJ m(-3) for mill residues and 2.5 MJ m(-3) for forest residues. Biochars produced have similar particle size distributions and bulk density, but vary in pH and carbon content. Biochars from both systems were successfully activated using steam activation, with resulting BET surface area in the range of commercial activated carbon. Results are discussed in the context of co-locating these systems with forest industry operations.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 183
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Biochar as a Fuel: 1. Properties and Grindability of Biochars Produced from the Pyrolysis of Mallee Wood under Slow-Heating Conditions [J].
Abdullah, Hanisom ;
Wu, Hongwei .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2009, 23 (08) :4174-4181
[2]  
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2011, D4607942011 ASTM INT
[3]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSMENT FOREST BA
[4]   High-yield biomass charcoal [J].
Antal, MJ ;
Croiset, E ;
Dai, XF ;
DeAlmeida, C ;
Mok, WSL ;
Norberg, N ;
Richard, JR ;
AlMajthoub, M .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1996, 10 (03) :652-658
[5]   Biochar as a precursor of activated carbon [J].
Azargohar, R. ;
Dalai, A. K. .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 131 (1-3) :762-773
[6]   Use of mobile fast pyrolysis plants to densify biomass and reduce biomass handling costs - A preliminary assessment [J].
Badger, PC ;
Fransham, P .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (04) :321-325
[7]   Surface functionality and porosity of activated carbons obtained from chemical activation of wood [J].
Benaddi, H ;
Bandosz, TJ ;
Jagiello, J ;
Schwarz, JA ;
Rouzaud, JN ;
Legras, D ;
Béguin, F .
CARBON, 2000, 38 (05) :669-674
[8]  
Bergman P.C.A., 2005, Development of torrefaction for biomass co-firing in existing coal-fired power stations, ECN report
[9]  
Bergman R, 2010, WOOD HDB WOOD ENG MA
[10]  
Biochar Solutions Incorporated (BSI), 2011, BSI BIOCH BAS UN TEC