Numbers Can Be Worth a Thousand Pictures: Individual Differences in Understanding Graphical and Numerical Representations of Health-Related Information

被引:124
作者
Gaissmaier, Wolfgang [1 ]
Wegwarth, Odette [1 ]
Skopec, David [2 ]
Mueller, Ann-Sophie [2 ]
Broschinski, Sebastian [2 ]
Politi, Mary C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Harding Ctr Risk Literacy, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Zurich Univ Arts, Dept Design, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
graph literacy; health literacy; icon arrays; medical decision making; risk communication; RISK COMMUNICATION; NUMERACY SCALE; DECISION AIDS; COMPREHENSION; BENEFIT; MEMORY; ADULTS; WORDS;
D O I
10.1037/a0024850
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Informed medical decision making requires comprehending statistical information. We aimed to improve the understanding of conveying health-related statistical information with graphical representations compared with numerical representations. First, we investigated whether the iconicity of representations (i.e., their abstractness vs. concreteness) affected comprehension and recall of statistical information. Second, we investigated whether graph literacy helps to identify individuals who comprehend graphical representations better than numerical representations. Method: Participants (N = 275) were randomly assigned to receive different representations of health-related statistical information, ranging from very low iconicity (numbers) to very high iconicity (icon arrays including photographs). Comprehension and recall of the information were assessed. Additionally, participants rated the accessibility of the information and the attractiveness of the representation. Graph literacy was assessed by means of a recently developed scale. Results: The only difference between representations that affected comprehension and recall was the difference between graphics and numbers; the actual level of iconicity of graphics did not matter. Individuals with high graph literacy had better comprehension and recall when presented with graphics instead of numbers, and they rated graphical information as more accessible than numerical information, whereas the reverse was true for individuals with low graph literacy, F(4, 185) an 2.60, p = .04, eta(2)(p) = .05, and F(4, 245) = 2.71, p =.03, eta(2)(p) = .04, respectively. Both groups judged graphical representations as more attractive than numerical representations. Conclusion: An assessment of graph literacy distinguished individuals who are best informed with graphical representations of statistical information from those who are better informed with numerical representations.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 296
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review
    Ancker, Jessica S.
    Senathirajah, Yalini
    Kukafka, Rita
    Starren, Justin B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2006, 13 (06) : 608 - 618
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, Psychological science in the public interest, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6053.2008.00033.X
  • [3] The meaning and the measure of health literacy
    Baker, David W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (08) : 878 - 883
  • [4] Involving patients in medical decisions - How can physicians do better?
    Barry, MJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24): : 2356 - 2357
  • [5] What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria
    Bunge, Martina
    Muehlhauser, Ingrid
    Steckelberg, Anke
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 78 (03) : 316 - 328
  • [6] Single dose oral ibuprofen for acute postoperative pain in adults
    Derry, C.
    Derry, S.
    Moore, R. A.
    McQuay, H. J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03):
  • [7] How should effectiveness of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged? A review of the literature
    Edwards, A
    Elwyn, G
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (04) : 428 - 434
  • [8] Edwards JE, 2000, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD002067, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD002067]
  • [9] Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Connor, Annette
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert
    Edwards, Adrian
    Coulter, Angela
    Thomson, Richard
    Barrat, Alexandra
    Butow, Phyllis
    Barry, Michael
    Mulley, Albert G.
    Sepucha, Karen
    Bernstein, Steven
    Clarke, Aileen
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary
    Moumjid, Nora
    Ruland, Cornelia
    Sykes, Alan
    Whelan, Tim
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565): : 417 - 419
  • [10] Measuring numeracy without a Math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    Ubel, Peter A.
    Jankovic, Aleksandra
    Derry, Holly A.
    Smith, Dylan M.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (05) : 672 - 680