The quality of reconstructed 3D images in multidetector-row helical CT: Experimental study involving scan parameters

被引:8
作者
Shin, JH
Lee, HK
Choi, CG
Suh, DC
Lim, TH
Kang, W
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Daejeon Univ, Dept Informat & Stat, Taejon, South Korea
关键词
computed tomography (CT); helical; three-dimensional; experimental study;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2002.3.1.49
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine which multicletector-row helical CT scanning technique provides the best-quality reconstructed 3D images, and to assess differences in image quality according to the levels of the scanning parameters used. Materials and Methods: Four objects with different surfaces and contours were scanned using multicletector-row helical CT at three detector-row collimations (1.25, 2.50, 5.00 mm), two pitches (3.0, 6.0), and three different degrees of overlap between the reconstructed slices (0%, 25%, 50%). Reconstructed 3D images of the resulting 72 sets of data were produced using volumetric rendering. The 72 images were graded on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best) for each of four rating criteria, giving a mean score for each criterion and an overall mean score. Statistical analysis was used to assess differences in image quality according to scanning parameter levels. Results: The mean score for each rating criterion, and the overall mean score, varied significantly according to the scanning parameter levels used. With regard to detector-row collimation and pitch, all levels of scanning parameters gave rise to significant differences, while in the degree of overlap of reconstructed slices, there were significant differences between overlap of 0% and of 50% in all levels of scanning parameters, and between overlap of 25% and of 50% in overall accuracy and overall mean score. Among the 18 scanning sequences, the highest score (4.94) was achieved with 1.25 mm detector-row collimation, 3.0 pitch, and 50% overlap between reconstructed slices. Conclusion: Comparison of the quality of reconstructed 3D images obtained using multidetector-row helical CT and various scanning techniques indicated that the 1.25 mm, 3.0, 50% scanning sequence was best. Quality improved as detector-row collimation decreased; as pitch was reduced from 6.0 to 3.0; and as overlap between reconstructed slices increased.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 56
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] HELICAL CT - PRINCIPLES AND TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    BRINK, JA
    HEIKEN, JP
    WANG, G
    MCENERY, KW
    SCHLUETER, FJ
    VANNIER, MW
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 1994, 14 (04) : 887 - 893
  • [2] COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING WITH SIMULTANEOUS PATIENT TRANSLATION
    CRAWFORD, CR
    KING, KF
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (06) : 967 - 982
  • [3] The quality of 3D reconstructions from 1.0 and 1.5 pitch helical and conventional CT
    Hopper, KD
    Pierantozzi, D
    Potok, PS
    Kasales, CJ
    TenHave, TR
    Meilstrup, JW
    VanSlyke, MA
    Mahraj, R
    Westacott, S
    Hartzel, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1996, 20 (05) : 841 - 847
  • [4] Four multidetector-row helical CT: Image quality and volume coverage speed
    Hu, H
    He, HD
    Foley, WD
    Fox, SH
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [5] Multi-slice helical CT: Scan and reconstruction
    Hu, H
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [6] SPIRAL VOLUMETRIC CT WITH SINGLE-BREATH-HOLD TECHNIQUE, CONTINUOUS TRANSPORT, AND CONTINUOUS SCANNER ROTATION
    KALENDER, WA
    SEISSLER, W
    KLOTZ, E
    VOCK, P
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) : 181 - 183
  • [7] A COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND SPIRAL CT - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY ON THE DETECTION OF SPHERICAL LESIONS
    KALENDER, WA
    POLACIN, A
    SUSS, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1994, 18 (02) : 167 - 176
  • [8] PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS OF SPIRAL CT SCANNING
    KALENDER, WA
    POLACIN, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (05) : 910 - 915
  • [9] RECONSTRUCTED HELICAL CT SCANS - IMPROVEMENT IN Z-AXIS RESOLUTION COMPARED WITH OVERLAPPED AND NONOVERLAPPED CONVENTIONAL CT SCANS
    KASALES, CJ
    HOPPER, KD
    ARIOLA, DN
    TENHAVE, TR
    MEILSTRUP, JW
    MAHRAJ, RPM
    VANHOOK, D
    WESTACOTT, S
    SEFCZEK, RJ
    BARR, JD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 164 (05) : 1281 - 1284
  • [10] Multiplanar image reconstruction and 3D imaging using a musculoskeletal phantom; Conventional versus helical CT
    Kasales, CJ
    Mauger, DT
    Sefczek, RJ
    Mahraj, R
    Meilstrup, JW
    VanHook, D
    Patrone, SVM
    Sefczek, DM
    Eggli, KD
    Wise, SW
    Westacott, S
    Hopper, KD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1997, 21 (01) : 162 - 169