Low-field MRI can be more sensitive than high-field MRI

被引:106
|
作者
Coffey, Aaron M. [1 ,2 ]
Truong, Milton L. [1 ]
Chekmenev, Eduard Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Inst Imaging Sci VUIIS, Dept Radiol, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biochem, Nashville, TN 37205 USA
关键词
Hyperpolarization; MRI; NMR; Low-field MRI; Litz wire; 13C; TO-NOISE RATIO; SOLENOIDAL MICROCOIL DESIGN; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2013.10.013
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
MRI signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is the key factor for image quality. Conventionally, SNR is proportional to nuclear spin polarization, which scales linearly with magnetic field strength. Yet ever-stronger magnets present numerous technical and financial limitations. Low-field MRI can mitigate these constraints with equivalent SNR from non-equilibrium 'hyperpolarization' schemes, which increase polarization by orders of magnitude independently of the magnetic field. Here, theory and experimental validation demonstrate that combination of field independent polarization (e.g. hyperpolarization) with frequency optimized MRI detection coils (i.e. multi-turn coils using the maximum allowed conductor length) results in low-field MRI sensitivity approaching and even rivaling that of high-field MRI. Four read-out frequencies were tested using samples with identical numbers of H-1 and C-13 spins. Experimental SNRs at 0.0475 T were,similar to 40% of those obtained at 4.7 T. Conservatively, theoretical SNRs at 0.0475T 1.13-fold higher than those at 4.7 T were possible despite an similar to 100-fold lower detection frequency, indicating feasibility of high-sensitivity MRI without technically challenging, expensive high-field magnets. The data at 4.7 T and 0.0475 T was obtained from different spectrometers with different RF probes. The SNR comparison between the two field strengths accounted for many differences in parameters such as system noise figures and variations in the probe detection coils including Q factors and coil diameters. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 174
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MRI in rheumatoid arthritis of the hands: Comparison of high-field and low-field MRI
    Taouli, BA
    Zaim, S
    Lynch, JA
    Peterfy, CG
    Stork, A
    Fan, B
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 523 - 523
  • [2] Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders
    Pääkkö, E
    Reinikainen, H
    Lindholm, EL
    Rissanen, T
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (07) : 1361 - 1368
  • [3] Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders
    Eija Pääkkö
    Heli Reinikainen
    Eija-Leena Lindholm
    Tarja Rissanen
    European Radiology, 2005, 15 : 1361 - 1368
  • [4] MRI in rheumatoid arthritis of the hands: Comparison of high-field and low field MRI
    Faouli, B
    Zaim, S
    Peterty, CG
    Lynch, JA
    Fan, B
    Eve, KH
    Genant, KH
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2001, 44 (09): : S224 - S224
  • [5] High-field MRI
    Cunningham, Patricia M.
    Law, Meng
    Schweitzer, Mark E.
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 37 (03) : 321 - +
  • [6] The future combines high and low-field MRI
    Edjlali-Goujon, Myriam
    Loevblad, Karl-Olof
    JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 50 (05) : 463 - 463
  • [7] Modern low-field MRI
    Pogarell, Tobias
    Heiss, Rafael
    Janka, Rolf
    Nagel, Armin M.
    Uder, Michael
    Roemer, Frank W.
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (09) : 1751 - 1760
  • [8] Low-field MRI pelvimetry
    T. A. Tukeva
    H. J. Aronen
    P. T. Karjalainen
    P. J. Mäkelä
    European Radiology, 1997, 7 : 230 - 234
  • [9] Low-field musculoskeletal MRI
    Ghazinoor, Shaya
    Crues, John V., III
    Crowley, Chris
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 25 (02) : 234 - 244
  • [10] Low-field MRI pelvimetry
    Tukeva, TA
    Aronen, HJ
    Karjalainen, PT
    Makela, PJ
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (02) : 230 - 234