Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge management: A review

被引:138
作者
Yoshida, Hiroko [1 ]
Christensen, Thomas H. [1 ]
Scheutz, Charlotte [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Environm Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
关键词
Life cycle assessment; environmental assessment; wastewater; sewage sludge; incineration; anaerobic digestion; land application; URBAN WASTE-WATER; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; TREATMENT PLANTS; LAND APPLICATION; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; SYSTEMS; ENERGY; REUSE;
D O I
10.1177/0734242X13504446
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this article, 35 published studies on life cycle assessment (LCA) of sewage sludge were reviewed for their methodological and technological assumptions. Overall, LCA has been providing a flexible framework to quantify environmental impacts of wastewater and sewage sludge treatment and disposal processes for multiple scales, ranging from process selection to policy evaluation. The results of LCA are, in principle, unique to the goal and scope of each study, reflecting its local conditions and comparison between different LCAs is not intended. Furthermore, the assessments are limited by the methodological development of the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) and the advancement of research in quantifying environmental emissions associated with wastewater and sewage sludge treatment processes. Thus, large discrepancies were found in the selection of the environmental emissions to be included and how they were estimated in the analysis. In order to reduce these choice uncertainties, consolidation of the modelling approach in the following area are recommended: quantification of fugitive gas emissions and modelling of disposal practices. Besides harmonization of the key technical assumptions, clear documentation of the modelling approach and the uncertainties associating with each assumption is encouraged so as to improve the integrity and robustness of assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1101
页数:19
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 13 EC
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment of an intensive sewage treatment plant in Barcelona (Spain) with focus on energy aspects
    Bravo, L.
    Ferrer, I.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 64 (02) : 440 - 447
  • [3] Assessment of sludge reuse options: a life-cycle approach
    Bridle, T
    Skrypski-Mantele, S
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (08) : 131 - 135
  • [4] Greenhouse gas balance for composting operations
    Brown, Sally
    Kruger, Chad
    Subler, Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2008, 37 (04) : 1396 - 1410
  • [5] Calculator Tool for Determining Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Biosolids Processing and End Use
    Brown, Sally
    Beecher, Ned
    Carpenter, Andrew
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (24) : 9509 - 9515
  • [6] Urban wastewater management in the United States: Past, present, and future
    Burian, SJ
    Nix, SJ
    Pitt, RE
    Durrans, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 7 (03) : 33 - 62
  • [7] Occurrence and removal of potentially toxic metals and heavy metals in the wastewater treatment plant of fusina (Venice, Italy)
    Busetti, F
    Badoer, S
    Cuomo, M
    Rubino, B
    Traverso, P
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (24) : 9264 - 9272
  • [8] Behavior of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant
    Carballa, M
    Omil, F
    Lema, JM
    Llompart, M
    García-Jares, C
    Rodríguez, I
    Gómez, M
    Ternes, T
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (12) : 2918 - 2926
  • [9] Should We Pretreat Solid Waste Prior to Anaerobic Digestion? An Assessment of Its Environmental Cost
    Carballa, Marta
    Duran, Cecilia
    Hospido, Almudena
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (24) : 10306 - 10314
  • [10] Biosolids - A fuel or a waste? An integrated appraisal of five co-cornhustion scenarios with policy analysis
    Cartmell, E
    Gostelow, P
    Riddell-Black, D
    Simms, N
    Oakey, J
    Morris, J
    Jeffrey, P
    Howsam, P
    Pollard, SJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (03) : 649 - 658