Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of d-chlorpheniramine following intravenous and oral administration in healthy Thoroughbred horses

被引:7
作者
Kuroda, Taisuke [1 ,3 ]
Nagata, Shun-ichi [2 ]
Takizawa, Yoshimasa [1 ]
Tamura, Norihisa [1 ]
Kusano, Kanichi [1 ]
Mizobe, Fumiaki [1 ]
Harju, Kazuhisa [1 ]
机构
[1] JRA, Miho Training Ctr, Equine Clin, Inashiki, Ibaragi 3000493, Japan
[2] Lab Racing Chem, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 3200851, Japan
[3] JRA, Ritto Training Ctr, Equine Clin, Ritto, Shiga 5203085, Japan
关键词
Horse; Antihistamine; d-Chlorpheniramine; Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics; 2ND-GENERATION ANTIHISTAMINE; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; INDUCED WHEAL; PHARMACOLOGY; FEXOFENADINE; ANTAGONISTS; CETIRIZINE; EBASTINE; TERFENADINE; CLEMASTINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.02.003
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The pharmacokinetics of d-chlorpheniramine (CPM), a histamine H-1-receptor antagonist, and its ability to inhibit of histamine-induced cutaneous wheal formation, were studied in healthy Thoroughbred horses (n = 5). Following an intravenous (IV) dose of 0.5 mg/kg bodyweight (BW), plasma drug disposition was very rapid, with the mean terminal half-life and total body clearance calculated as 2.7 h and 0.7 L/h/kg, respectively. The observed maximal inhibition of wheal formation following IV doses of 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg BW were 37.8% and 60.6% at 0.5 h, respectively. Oral administration of CPM (0.5 mg/kg BW) resulted in a bioavailability of 38%, which induced a peak plasma drug concentration at 1 h and a maximal inhibition of wheal formation (39%) at 2 h. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic link model showed that CPM in horses has lower efficacy, much lower potency and slightly lower sensitivity than other reported antihistamines. These results indicated that CPM should be administered at frequent intervals or at large dose rates to maintain therapeutic concentrations in horses. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 437
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Chauret N, 1997, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V25, P1130
[2]  
Cook CP, 2004, CAN VET J, V45, P414
[3]  
GOLDBERG MJ, 1987, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V240, P717
[4]   A double-blind, single-dose, crossover comparison of cetirizine, ebastine, epinastine, fexofenadine, terfenadine, and loratadine versus placebo: suppression of histamine-induced wheal and flare response for 24 h in [J].
Grant, JA ;
Danielson, L ;
Rihoux, JP ;
DeVos, C .
ALLERGY, 1999, 54 (07) :700-707
[5]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF CHLORPHENIRAMINE AFTER INTRAVENOUS AND ORAL-ADMINISTRATION IN NORMAL ADULTS [J].
HUANG, SM ;
ATHANIKAR, NK ;
SRIDHAR, K ;
HUANG, YC ;
CHIOU, WL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 22 (04) :359-365
[6]   A COMPARISON OF THE PHARMACODYNAMICS OF H-1-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS AS ASSESSED BY THE INDUCED WHEAL-AND-FLARE MODEL [J].
JUHLIN, L .
ALLERGY, 1995, 50 (24) :24-30
[7]   Current advances in the management of urticaria [J].
Khalaf, Ahmad T. ;
Li, Wang ;
Tan Jinquan .
ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, 2008, 56 (02) :103-114
[8]  
Knottenbelt D, 2006, EQUINE FORMULARY
[9]  
MERCHANT SR, 1989, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V195, P647
[10]  
MILLER WH, 1994, CAN VET J, V35, P502