Update on Quantitative Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Response in Oncology

被引:5
作者
Gillman, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Pantel, Austin R. [1 ]
Mankoff, David A. [1 ]
Edmonds, Christine E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Div Nucl Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; HER2-POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER; CELL LUNG-CANCER; EARLY METABOLIC-RESPONSE; (18)FDG PET-CT; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; F-18-FDG PET/CT; FDG-PET/CT; EVALUATION CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.07.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Molecular imaging has revolutionized clinical oncology by imaging-specific facets of cancer biology. Through noninvasive measurements of tumor physiology, targeted radiotracers can serve as biomarkers for disease characterization, prognosis, response assessment, and predicting long-term response/survival. In turn, these imaging biomarkers can be utilized to tailor therapeutic regimens to tumor biology. In this article, we review biomarker applications for response assessment and predicting long-term outcomes. F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a measure of cellular glucose metabolism, is discussed in the context of lymphoma and breast and lung cancer. FDG has gained widespread clinical acceptance and has been integrated into the routine clinical care of several malignancies, most notably lymphoma. The novel radiotracers 16 alpha-F-18-fluoro-17 beta-estradiol and F-18-fluorothymidine are reviewed in application to the early prediction of response assessment of breast cancer. Through illustrative examples, we explore current and future applications of molecular imaging biomarkers in the advancement of precision medicine. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 517
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials
    Kurland, Brenda F.
    Gerstner, Elizabeth R.
    Mountz, James M.
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Ryan, Christopher W.
    Graham, Michael M.
    Buatti, John M.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Eikman, Edward A.
    Kumar, Virendra
    Forster, Kenneth M.
    Wahl, Richard L.
    Lieberman, Frank S.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (09) : 1301 - 1312
  • [2] The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective
    Press, Robert H.
    Shu, Hui-Kuo G.
    Shim, Hyunsuk
    Mountz, James M.
    Kurland, Brenda F.
    Wahl, Richard L.
    Jones, Ella F.
    Hylton, Nola M.
    Gerstner, Elizabeth R.
    Nordstrom, Robert J.
    Henderson, Lori
    Kurdziel, Karen A.
    Vikram, Bhadrasain
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Holdhoff, Matthias
    Taylor, Edward
    Jaffray, David A.
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Mankoff, David A.
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    Linden, Hannah M.
    Lambin, Philippe
    Dilling, Thomas J.
    Rubin, Daniel L.
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir
    Buatti, John M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (04): : 1219 - 1235
  • [3] Current and emerging quantitative magnetic resonance imaging methods for assessing and predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy
    Abramson, Richard G.
    Arlinghaus, Lori R.
    Weis, Jared A.
    Li, Xia
    Dula, Adrienne N.
    Chekmenev, Eduard Y.
    Smith, Seth A.
    Miga, Michael I.
    Abramson, Vandana G.
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2012, 4 : 139 - 154
  • [4] Voxel Forecast for Precision Oncology: Predicting Spatially Variant and Multiscale Cancer Therapy Response on Longitudinal Quantitative Molecular Imaging
    Bowen, Stephen R.
    Hippe, Daniel S.
    Chaovalitwongse, W. Art
    Duan, Chunyan
    Thammasorn, Phawis
    Liu, Xiao
    Miyaoka, Robert S.
    Vesselle, Hubert J.
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    Rengan, Ramesh
    Zeng, Jing
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (16) : 5027 - 5037
  • [5] PET imaging for assessing tumor response to therapy
    Mankoff, David A.
    Katz, Sharyn I.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 118 (02) : 362 - 373
  • [6] In Vivo Imaging of Apoptosis in Oncology: An Update
    Vangestel, Christel
    Peeters, Marc
    Mees, Gilles
    Oltenfreiter, Ruth
    Boersma, Hendrikus H.
    Elsinga, Philip H.
    Reutelingsperger, Chris
    Van Damme, Nancy
    De Spiegeleer, Bart
    Van de Wiele, Christophe
    MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 10 (05) : 340 - 358
  • [7] Quantitative Imaging for Radiation Oncology
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (04): : 683 - 686
  • [8] Imaging of response to treatment in oncology
    Fournier, L. S.
    Cuenod, C. A.
    Clement, O.
    Siauve, N.
    Frija, G.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (06): : 829 - 843
  • [9] Tumor Response Evaluation in Oncology: Current Update
    Shanbhogue, Alampady Krishna Prasad
    Karnad, Anand B.
    Prasad, Srinivasa R.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2010, 34 (04) : 479 - 484
  • [10] Quantitative imaging biomarkers in neuro-oncology
    Waldman, Adam D.
    Jackson, Alan
    Price, Stephen J.
    Clark, Christopher A.
    Booth, Thomas C.
    Auer, Dorothee P.
    Tofts, Paul S.
    Collins, David J.
    Leach, Martin O.
    Rees, Jeremy H.
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 6 (08) : 445 - 454