Diurnal and seasonal photosynthesis in two asparagus cultivars with contrasting yield

被引:11
作者
Guo, JM
Jermyn, WA
Turnbull, MH
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Plant & Microbial Sci, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
[2] New Zealand Inst Crop & Food Res, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2002.0399
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
To investigate physiological characters underpinning spear yield in asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.), diurnal and seasonal changes in photosynthetic parameters were measured under field conditions in two cultivars with contrasting yield. Seasonal patterns in photosynthetic parameters were strongly dependent on cladophyll developmental stage in both cultivars. The greatest photosynthetic rates of 8.94 +/- 0.54 mumol m(-2) s(-1) for the high-yielding cultivar (ASP-69) and 6.50 +/- 0.38 mumol m(-2) s(-1) for the low-yielding cultivar (ASP-03) were observed in fully expanded cladophyll tissue measured in mid-summer (February) when both photon flux density (PFD) and temperature were at a maximum. A significant decline in net photosynthetic rate (A) was measured in April, when plants experienced colder night temperatures and shorter day lengths. A close correlation between A and stomatal conductance (g(s)) (r = 0.84) was observed. Timing of cladophyll initiation and duration did not appear to be significant factors contributing to cultivar difference in photosynthesis. Variation in photosynthetic capacity between the two cultivars was related to significant differences in cladophyll thickness and specific leaf weight (SLW). The results substantiate the conclusion that both metabolic and anatomical factors play significant roles in determining differences in photosynthetic capacity between the two asparagus cultivars studied.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
BABU RC, 1985, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V19, P159
[2]   A study of photosynthetic activities of eight asparagus genotypes under field conditions [J].
Bai, YY ;
Kelly, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1999, 124 (01) :61-66
[3]  
Bolhar-Nordenkampf H. R., 1993, P193
[4]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[5]   NONSTOMATAL LIMITATION OF CO2 ASSIMILATION IN 3 TREE SPECIES DURING NATURAL DROUGHT CONDITIONS [J].
BRIGGS, GM ;
JURIK, TW ;
GATES, DM .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1986, 66 (03) :521-526
[6]  
DAIE J, 1985, HORTIC REV, V7, P69
[7]  
DOWNTON W J S, 1975, Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, V2, P367
[8]  
Evans L.T., 1993, CROP EVOLUTION ADAPT
[9]  
EVANS LT, 1994, PHYSIOLOGY AND DETERMINATION OF CROP YIELD, P19
[10]   STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS [J].
FARQUHAR, GD ;
SHARKEY, TD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1982, 33 :317-345