A Systematic Review of Quantitative Resilience Measures for Water Infrastructure Systems

被引:130
作者
Shin, Sangmin [1 ]
Lee, Seungyub [1 ]
Judi, David R. [2 ]
Parvania, Masood [3 ]
Goharian, Erfan [4 ]
McPherson, Timothy [2 ]
Burian, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99354 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
WATER | 2018年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
resilience; reliability; water infrastructure system; water resources system; water distribution network; water supply; DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; RESOURCE SYSTEM; RELIABILITY; VULNERABILITY; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; VARIABILITY; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.3390/w10020164
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the past few decades, the concept of resilience has emerged as an important consideration in the planning and management of water infrastructure systems. Accordingly, various resilience measures have been developed for the quantitative evaluation and decision-making of systems. There are, however, numerous considerations and no clear choice of which measure, if any, provides the most appropriate representation of resilience for a given application. This study provides a critical review of quantitative approaches to measure the resilience of water infrastructure systems, with a focus on water resources and distribution systems. A compilation of 11 criteria evaluating 21 selected resilience measures addressing major features of resilience is developed using the Axiomatic Design process. Existing gaps of resilience measures are identified based on the review criteria. The results show that resilience measures have generally paid less attention to cascading damage to interrelated systems, rapid identification of failure, physical damage of system components, and time variation of resilience. Concluding the paper, improvements to resilience measures are recommended. The findings contribute to our understanding of gaps and provide information to help further improve resilience measures of water infrastructure systems.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] Quantitative assessment of resilience of a water supply system under rainfall reduction due to climate change
    Amarasinghe, Pradeep
    Liu, An
    Egodawatta, Prasanna
    Barnes, Paul
    McGree, James
    Goonetilleke, Ashantha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 540 : 1043 - 1052
  • [2] Amarasinghe U., 2005, Spatial Variation in Water Supply and Demand across River Basins of India, V83
  • [3] [Anonymous], UNDERSTANDING APPL C
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, WATER UTILITY J
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, ECOL SOC
  • [6] Performance evaluation of a water resources system under varying climatic conditions: Reliability, Resilience, Vulnerability and beyond
    Asefa, Tirusew
    Clayton, John
    Adams, Alison
    Anderson, Damann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 508 : 53 - 65
  • [7] Use of Domain Knowledge to Increase the Convergence Rate of Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing the Cost and Resilience of Water Distribution Systems
    Bi, Weiwei
    Dandy, Graeme C.
    Maier, Holger R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 142 (09)
  • [8] Risk and resilience to enhance sustainability with application to urban water systems
    Blackmore, Jane M.
    Plant, Roel A. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 134 (03) : 224 - 233
  • [9] A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities
    Bruneau, M
    Chang, SE
    Eguchi, RT
    Lee, GC
    O'Rourke, TD
    Reinhorn, AM
    Shinozuka, M
    Tierney, K
    Wallace, WA
    von Winterfeldt, D
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) : 733 - 752
  • [10] A New Approach to Urban Water Management: Safe and Sure
    Butler, D.
    Farmani, R.
    Fu, G.
    Ward, S.
    Diao, K.
    Astaraie-Imani, M.
    [J]. 16TH WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS CONFERENCE (WDSA2014): URBAN WATER HYDROINFORMATICS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING, 2014, 89 : 347 - 354