Clinical toxicity of antibody drug conjugates: a meta-analysis of payloads

被引:197
作者
Masters, Joanna C. [1 ]
Nickens, Dana J. [2 ]
Xuan, Dawei [3 ]
Shazer, Ronald L. [4 ]
Amantea, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Oncol, Clin Pharmacol, Global Prod Dev, 10555 Sci Ctr Dr, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[2] Pfizer Inc, Global Prod Dev, Global Pharmacometr, 10555 Sci Ctr Dr, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[3] Pfizer Inc, Early Oncol Dev & Clin Res, Worldwide Res & Dev, Clin Pharmacol, 10777 Sci Ctr Dr, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[4] Inspyr Therapeut Inc, 31200 Via Colinas,Suite 200, Westlake Village, CA 91362 USA
关键词
Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs); Oncology; Clinical trials; Safety; Toxicity; Meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10637-017-0520-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) utilize a monoclonal antibody to deliver a cytotoxic payload specifically to tumor cells, limiting exposure to healthy tissues. Major clinical toxicities of ADCs include hematologic, hepatic, neurologic, and ophthalmic events, which are often dose-limiting. These events may be off-target effects caused by premature release of payload in circulation. A meta-analysis was performed to summarize key clinical safety data for ADCs by payload, and data permitting, establish a dose-response model for toxicity incidence as a function of payload, dose/regimen, and cancer type. Methods A literature search was performed to identify and extract data from clinical ADC studies. Toxicity incidence and severity were collected by treatment arm for anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, hepatic toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, and ocular toxicity. Exploratory plots, descriptive summaries, and logistic regression modelling were used to explore Grade >= 3 (G3/4) toxicities and assess the impact of covariates, including cancer type and dose/regimen. Results The dataset contained 70 publications; quantitative analysis included 43 studies with G3/4 toxicity information reported for the endpoints above. G3/4 anemia, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were consistently reported for MMAE ADCs, thrombocytopenia and hepatic toxicity for DM1, and ocular toxicity for MMAF. Safety profiles of MMAE, DM1, and DM4 ADCs differed between solid and hematologic cancers. Conclusions Published ADC clinical data is limited by non-uniform reporting for toxicity and lack of dosing information, limiting the ability to develop quantitative models relating toxicity to exposure. However, the current analysis suggests that key G3/4 toxicities of ADCs in the clinic are likely off-target and related to payload.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 135
页数:15
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions
    Agresti, A
    Coull, BA
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) : 119 - 126
  • [2] Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody drug conjugates
    Beck, Alain
    Goetsch, Liliane
    Dumontet, Charles
    Corvaia, Nathalie
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2017, 16 (05) : 315 - 337
  • [3] Antibody-drug conjugates-A new wave of cancer drugs
    Bouchard, Herve
    Viskov, Christian
    Garcia-Echeverria, Carlos
    [J]. BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2014, 24 (23) : 5357 - 5363
  • [4] Antibody- Drug Conjugates: An Emerging Concept in Cancer Therapy
    Chari, Ravi V. J.
    Miller, Michael L.
    Widdison, Wayne C.
    [J]. ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2014, 53 (15) : 3796 - 3827