On Dancy's account of practical reasoning

被引：1

作者：

Raz, Joseph ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Kings Coll London, Dickson Poon Sch Law, London, England

来源：

PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLORATIONS | 2020年 / 23卷 / 02期

关键词：

reasoning; practical reasoning; Dancy;

D O I：

10.1080/13869795.2020.1767904

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

Dancy's main thesis is that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an action, and indeed that makes the reasoning practical. I trace his argument, suggest improvements to its superficial deficiencies, and conclude that it fails because Dancy misunderstands the nature of reasoning.

引用

页码：135 / 145

页数：11