Features of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems Supportive of Nursing Practice A Literature Review

被引:21
作者
Lee, Seonah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Coll Nursing, St Louis, MO 63121 USA
关键词
Computerized clinical decision support systems; Features; Nursing care; Sequential decision support; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; CANCER PAIN MANAGEMENT; PRESSURE ULCERS; CARE; NURSES; IMPLEMENTATION; EXPERIENCES; COLLECTION; PREVENTION; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1097/01.NCN.0000432127.99644.25
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study aimed to organize the system features of decision support technologies targeted at nursing practice into assessment, problem identification, care plans, implementation, and outcome evaluation. It also aimed to identify the range of the five stage-related sequential decision supports that computerized clinical decision support systems provided. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched. A total of 27 studies were reviewed. The system features collected represented the characteristics of each category from patient assessment to outcome evaluation. Several features were common across the reviewed systems. For the sequential decision support, all of the reviewed systems provided decision support in sequence for patient assessment and care plans. Fewer than half of the systems included problem identification. There were only three systems operating in an implementation stage and four systems in outcome evaluation. Consequently, the key steps for sequential decision support functions were initial patient assessment, problem identification, care plan, and outcome evaluation. Providing decision support in such a full scope will effectively help nurses' clinical decision making. By organizing the system features, a comprehensive picture of nursing practice-oriented computerized decision support systems was obtained; however, the development of a guideline for better systems should go beyond the scope of a literature review.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 495
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Adams William G, 2003, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, REP BRIEF CROSS QUAL
  • [3] Integrating evidence into clinical information systems for nursing decision support
    Bakken, Suzanne
    Currie, Leanne M.
    Lee, Nam-Ju
    Roberts, W. Dan
    Collins, Sarah A.
    Cimino, James J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2008, 77 (06) : 413 - 420
  • [4] Brokel Jane M, 2009, Urol Nurs, V29, P345
  • [5] Using information technology to assist in redesign of a fall prevention program
    Browne, JA
    Covington, BG
    Davila, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2004, 19 (03) : 218 - 225
  • [6] Barriers and facilitators to the use of computer-based intensive insulin therapy
    Campion, Thomas R., Jr.
    Waitman, Lemuel R.
    Lorenzi, Nancy M.
    May, Addison K.
    Gadd, Cynthia S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 80 (12) : 863 - 871
  • [7] Design and implementation of a standards-based interoperable clinical decision support architecture in the context of the Korean EHR
    Cho, InSook
    Kim, JeongAh
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Hyun Young
    Kim, Yoon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2010, 79 (09) : 611 - 622
  • [8] Nurses' Responses to Differing Amounts and Information Content in a Diagnostic Computer-Based Decision Support Application
    Cho, Insook
    Staggers, Nancy
    Park, Ihnsook
    [J]. CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2010, 28 (02) : 95 - 102
  • [9] Pressure ulcers: implementation of evidence-based nursing practice
    Clarke, HF
    Bradley, C
    Whytock, S
    Handfield, S
    van der Wal, R
    Gundry, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2005, 49 (06) : 578 - 590
  • [10] Coopmans Vicki C, 2008, AANA J, V76, P29