Reliability analysis of dynamic positioning systems

被引:0
作者
Clavijo, M. V. [1 ]
Martins, M. R. [1 ]
Schleder, A. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Anal Evaluat & Risk Management Lab LabRisco, Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn Dept, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dept Prod Engn, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
PROGRESS IN MARITIME TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING | 2018年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
This paper presents the quantitative reliability assessment for two typical configurations (a DP Class 2 semi-submersible platform and a DP Class 3 drillship); based on the present technological maturity and the offshore industry-reported component failure rates. In the analyzed DP2 and DP3 configurations, the control and thruster subsystems contribute to 1%, and 7% of the total DP system failures, while the power subsystem contribute to 10% and 6% of the total DP2 and DP3 system failure. Regarding the MTTF analysis, the drillship presents a Mean Time to Failure of 4.65 years, a 1.41 fold increase over semisubmersible platform. The results presented could be used for reliability-centered design and maintenance planning of DP systems.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 272
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] American Bureau of Shipping ABS, 2013, GUID DYN POS SYST
  • [2] BLISCHKE RW, 2003, CASE STUDIES RELIABI
  • [3] DNV, 2015, DYN POS SYST OP GUID
  • [4] DNV, 2013, DYN POS SYST RUL C 6, P29
  • [5] Ebrahimi A., 2010, Effect analysis of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)parameters in design and operation of Dynamic Positioning system in floating offshore structures
  • [6] *EPRI, 2001, REV REL EL DISTR SYS
  • [7] Ferreira, 2016, CONFIABILIDADE SISTE
  • [8] Hauff K., 2014, ANAL LOSS POSITION I
  • [9] Heringer, 2003, FUNDAMENTOS POSICION
  • [10] IEEE, 2007, DES REL IND COMM POW