The Use of Social Surveys to Measure Drought and the Impact of Drought

被引:10
作者
Hunter, Boyd [1 ]
Gray, Matthew [1 ]
Edwards, Ben [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Aboriginal Econ Policy Res, Res Sch Social Sci, Coll Arts & Social Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Australian Inst Family Studies, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Measuring drought; Social surveys; Subjective indicators; Socioeconomic impact;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-012-0102-0
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Although the term drought is widely used, defining it is conceptually and technically difficult and there is no generally accepted definition. This article uses data from an Australian social survey of people living in agricultural areas to test the validity of using general social surveys to ask respondents whether they are living in an area that is drought affected. Strong evidence is found that the survey based self-report measure of drought is both internally consistent and correlated with the standard Australian meteorological (rainfall deficit) measures of drought and thus provides a valid measure of whether individuals are experiencing the drought. The relationship between self-report drought and the standard meteorological measure of drought and financial hardship and changes in financial position is estimated. While a negative association between drought and financial position is found for both measures, the relationship is stronger for the self-report than the meteorological definition. The self-report measure is more closely linked to the economic, social and community impacts of low rainfall and provides greater flexibility in the geographic area over which drought is measured-thus survey data about drought allows respondents to define the area in way which is meteorologically, topographically or agriculturally meaningful.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 432
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], AUSTR WAT AV PROJ AW
  • [2] [Anonymous], B AM METEOROLOGICAL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 6 YEARS WID DROUGHT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, GOV DROUGHT SUPP
  • [5] [Anonymous], WAT ACC AUSTR 2008 0
  • [6] [Anonymous], INT POV CTR C MEAS M
  • [7] Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles
    Clark, Andrew E.
    Frijters, Paul
    Shields, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2008, 46 (01) : 95 - 144
  • [8] The reliability of self-assessed health status
    Crossley, TF
    Kennedy, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (04) : 643 - 658
  • [9] De Vaus D., 2002, SURVEYS SOCIAL RES
  • [10] Hagenaars A.J. M., 1986, PERCEPTION POVERTY