Empathy, sex and fluid intelligence as predictors of theory of mind

被引:88
作者
Ibanez, Agustin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huepe, David [3 ]
Gempp, Rene [4 ]
Gutierrez, Virna [5 ]
Rivera-Rei, Alvaro [3 ]
Isabel Toledo, Maria [3 ]
机构
[1] Favaloro Univ, Inst Cognit Neurol, Lab Expt Psychol & Neurosci, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Natl Sci & Tech Res Council CONICET, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Diego Portales, Fac Psicol, Santiago, Chile
[4] Univ Diego Portales, Fac Econ & Empresa, Santiago, Chile
[5] Univ Diego Portales, Fac Ingn, Santiago, Chile
关键词
ToM; Empathy; Fluid intelligence; Sex; Individual differences; Path analysis; HIGH-FUNCTIONING AUTISM; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA; SOCIAL COGNITION; ASPERGER-SYNDROME; FALSE BELIEF; MECHANISMS; STABILITY; ONTOGENY;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individual differences in theory of mind (TOM) are affected by a variety of factors. We investigated the relationship between empathy, sex and fluid intelligence (FI) as predictors of ToM in a random probabilistic sample of secondary students. First, we explored whether sex, as well as high, average or low levels of empathy and Fl affect ToM performance. Furthermore, we assessed the contribution of empathy, sex and Fl in predicting ToM by using a path analysis. This method allows testing of causal models of directed dependencies among a set of variables. The causal dependencies of empathy, sex and fluid intelligence were confirmed and identified. In addition, the model confirmed the direct effect of empathy, sex and fluid intelligence on ToM; and the indirect effect of sex mediated by empathy. Thus, individual differences in ToM levels are partially attributable to sex, empathy and fluid intelligence variability, raising important considerations for clinical research as well as ToM's theoretical models of domain specificity. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 621
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Executive Function Mechanisms of Theory of Mind [J].
Ahmed, Fayeza S. ;
Miller, L. Stephen .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2011, 41 (05) :667-678
[2]   Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition [J].
Amodio, DM ;
Frith, CD .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 7 (04) :268-277
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CAUSE CORRELATION BI, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511605949
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
[5]   Domain-specificity and theory of mind: evaluating neuropsychological evidence [J].
Apperly, IA ;
Samson, D ;
Humphreys, GW .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (12) :572-577
[6]  
Baron-Cohen S, 2001, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V42, P241, DOI 10.1017/S0021963001006643
[7]   The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences [J].
Baron-Cohen, S ;
Wheelwright, S .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2004, 34 (02) :163-175
[8]   Autism: The Empathizing-Systemizing (E-S) Theory [J].
Baron-Cohen, Simon .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE 2009, 2009, 1156 :68-80
[9]   Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit [J].
Barrett, Paul .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :815-824
[10]  
Bauldry S., 2015, International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, P615, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781412995627.D38, 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44055-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44055-9]