Economic Optimal Control for Minimizing Fuel Consumption of Heavy-Duty Trucks in a Highway Environment

被引:27
作者
Borek, John [1 ]
Groelke, Ben [2 ]
Earnhardt, Christian [2 ]
Vermillion, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Mech Engn, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Fuels; Optimization; Mathematical model; Road transportation; Vehicle dynamics; Aerodynamics; Economics; Dynamic programming; heavy-duty vehicles; model predictive control; optimal control; ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1109/TCST.2019.2918472
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper provides a comparative assessment of three economic optimal control strategies, aimed at minimizing the fuel consumption of heavy-duty trucks in a highway environment, under a representative lead vehicle model informed by traffic data. These strategies fuse a global, off-line dynamic programming (DP) optimization with online model predictive control (MPC). We then show how two of the three strategies can be adapted to accommodate the presence of traffic and optimally navigate signalized intersections using infrastructure-to-vehicular (I2V) communication. The MPC optimization, which is local in nature, makes refinements to a coarsely (but globally, subject to grid resolution) optimized target velocity profile from the DP optimization. The three candidate economic MPC formulations that are evaluated include a nonlinear time-based formulation that directly penalizes the predicted fuel consumption, a nonlinear time-based formulation that penalizes the braking effort as a surrogate for fuel consumption, and a linear distance-based convex formulation that maintains a tradeoff between energy expenditure and tracking of the coarsely optimized velocity profile obtained from DP. Using a medium-fidelity Simulink model, based on a Volvo truck's longitudinal and engine dynamics, we analyze the optimization's performance on four highway routes under various traffic scenarios. Results demonstrate 3.7%-8.3% fuel economy improvement on highway routes without traffic and 6.5%-10% on the same routes with traffic included. Furthermore, we present a detailed analysis of energy usage by "type" (aerodynamic losses, braking losses, and comparison of brake-specific fuel consumption), under each candidate control strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:1652 / 1664
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, An analysis of the operational costs of trucking: 2016 update (An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FED REGISTER, V81, P73478
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INV US GREENH GAS EM
[4]   Predictive Cruise Control: Utilizing Upcoming Traffic Signal Information for Improving Fuel Economy and Reducing Trip Time [J].
Asadi, Behrang ;
Vahidi, Ardalan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 19 (03) :707-714
[5]   An adaptive cruise control for connected energy-saving electric vehicles [J].
Bertoni, Lorenzo ;
Guanetti, Jacopo ;
Basso, Maria ;
Masoero, Marco ;
Cetinkunt, Sabri ;
Borrelli, Francesco .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01) :2359-2364
[6]   An MPC design flow for automotive control and applications to idle speed regulation [J].
Di Cairano, S. ;
Yanakiev, D. ;
Bemporad, A. ;
Kolmanovsky, I. V. ;
Hrovat, D. .
47TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, 2008 (CDC 2008), 2008, :5686-5691
[8]  
Groelke B, 2018, P AMER CONTR CONF, P834, DOI 10.23919/ACC.2018.8431050
[9]   Look-ahead control for heavy trucks to minimize trip time and fuel consumption [J].
Hellstrom, Erik ;
Ivarsson, Maria ;
Aslund, Jan ;
Nielsen, Lars .
CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2009, 17 (02) :245-254
[10]  
Henzler M, 2014, 2014 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), P1814, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2014.6957956