Determination of Dry Matter Yield and Yield Components of Local Forage Pea (Pisum sativum ssp arvense L.) Ecotypes

被引:10
|
作者
Tan, Mustafa [1 ]
Koc, Ali [2 ]
Gul, Zeynep Dumlu [1 ]
Elkoca, Erdal [1 ]
Gul, Ismail [3 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Osmangazi Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, Eskisehir, Turkey
[3] Erzurum Reg Directorate Agr Credit Cooperat, Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
Forage pea; Ecotypes; Dry matter yield; Hay quality; SEED YIELD; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001254
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Local forage pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) ecotypes are commonly cultivated in the Eastern Anatolia Region for long years. The ecotypes show great variations in yields and plant characteristics and these genetically resources should definitely be protected and be used as breeding material. The current study was conducted to determine the dry matter yields and yield components of 18 forage pea ecotypes selected among 61 collected materials from Erzurum, Bayburt, Kars and Ardahan provinces. The experiments were carried out in the experimental fields of Ataturk University Agricultural Faculty during the years of 2008, 2009 and 2010 under irrigated conditions. Three-year averages revealed large variations in dry matter yield the number of days to harvest, plant height, lodging degree and forage quality parameters of the ecotypes. Dry matter yields of ecotypes varied between 4862 and 6854 kg ha(-1), the number of days to harvest between 79.0 and 91.1 days and plant heights between 68.8 and 102.0 cm. Among the investigated ecotypes, the Degirmencik-1 and Subatan were considered to be promising ecotypes for breeding studies and regional yield studies.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 296
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Yield structure components of autumn- and spring-sown pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Neugschwandtner, Reinhard W.
    Bernhuber, Alexander
    Kammlander, Stefan
    Wagentristl, Helmut
    Klimek-Kopyra, Agnieszka
    Kaul, Hans-Peter
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 70 (02): : 109 - 116
  • [22] Investigation of grain yield and yield components of some field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in Mediterranean climate conditions
    Ton, Aybegun
    Karakoy, Tolga
    Anlarsal, A. Emin
    Turkeri, Meltem
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2018, 41 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [23] The Effect of Salt Stress on the Germination and Seedling Growth Parameters of a Selected Forage Pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) Genotype
    Demirkol, Gurkan
    Yilmaz, Nuri
    Onal Asci, Ozlem
    KSU TARIM VE DOGA DERGISI-KSU JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURE, 2019, 22 (03): : 354 - 359
  • [24] CLIMATE CHANGE AND FERTILIZATION INTERACTIONS ON PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.) YIELD
    Marton, Laszlo
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 36 : 703 - 706
  • [25] Effect of mineral fertilisation on the yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Kádár, I
    Fekete, S
    Radics, L
    NOVENYTERMELES, 2003, 52 (02): : 229 - 242
  • [26] Stability Analysis for Yield and Quality Characters in Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
    Sirohi, S. P. S.
    Gaurav, S. S.
    VEGETOS, 2008, 21 (01): : 103 - 109
  • [27] THE DRY MATTER YIELD, α-TOCOPHEROL, β-CAROTENE AND SOME MINERAL CONTENTS IN FODDER PEA (Pisum arvense L.) VARIETIES AT DIFFERENT GROWTH STAGES
    Ates, Ertan
    Tenikecier, Hazim Serkan
    Ozkan, Ugur
    COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2020, 73 (04): : 579 - 586
  • [28] Stability of yield and its components in garden pea (Pisum sativum)
    Pan, RS
    Prasad, VSRK
    Rai, M
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2001, 71 (11): : 701 - 703
  • [29] Forage pea (Pisum sativum var. arvense L.) landraces reveal morphological and genetic diversities
    Demirkol, Gurkan
    Yilmaz, Nuri
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2019, 43 (03) : 331 - 342
  • [30] QTL for yield components and protein content: a multienvironment study of two pea (Pisum sativum L.) populations
    Krajewski, P.
    Bocianowski, J.
    Gawlowska, M.
    Kaczmarek, Z.
    Pniewski, T.
    Swiecicki, W.
    Wolko, B.
    EUPHYTICA, 2012, 183 (03) : 323 - 336