Can ESG Ratings Stimulate Corporate Green Innovation? Evidence from China

被引:56
作者
Liu, Heying [1 ]
Lyu, Chan [1 ]
机构
[1] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Macau 999078, Peoples R China
关键词
ESG rating; corporate green innovation; institutional environment; redundant organizational resources; SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; PRESSURES;
D O I
10.3390/su141912516
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green innovation serves as both a catalyst for businesses to pursue sustainable development and a crucial step in achieving green circular economic development. Green innovation is the practice of organizations considering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects and the ESG advantages resulting from this process may become a driving force for enterprises to undergo a green transformation. Therefore, based on data related to Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2020, we study the relationship between ESG rating performance and corporate green innovation and its boundary mechanism. The results show that ESG ratings can improve the green innovation level of listed enterprises, and the relationship between ESG ratings and green innovation was also found to be strengthened by the institutional environment and redundant organizational resources. This study previously confirmed the positive impact of enterprises' ESG ratings on their green innovation, which has important implications for realizing the effective combination of ESG advantages and green innovation, promoting the construction of an ecological civilization, and realizing the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   INSTITUTIONAL AND COMPETITIVE BANDWAGONS - USING MATHEMATICAL-MODELING AS A TOOL TO EXPLORE INNOVATION DIFFUSION [J].
ABRAHAMSON, E ;
ROSENKOPF, L .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1993, 18 (03) :487-517
[2]   Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach [J].
Aguilera-Caracuel, Javier ;
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, Natalia .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 26 (04) :365-385
[3]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence [J].
Albuquerque, Rui ;
Koskinen, Yrjo ;
Zhang, Chendi .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) :4451-4469
[4]  
Atana Ruhaya., 2016, Int. Journal of Economics and Management, V10, P355
[5]   Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry [J].
Audia, PG ;
Greve, HR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (01) :83-94
[6]   The Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression [J].
Avetisyan, Emma ;
Hockerts, Kai .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (03) :316-330
[7]   Shareholder Engagement on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance [J].
Barko, Tamas ;
Cremers, Martijn ;
Renneboog, Luc .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2022, 180 (02) :777-812
[8]   Competition through environmental CSR engagement and cost of equity capital [J].
Ben Hmiden, Oussama ;
Rjiba, Hatem ;
Saadi, Samir .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47
[9]   Corporate social responsibility and market efficiency: Evidence from ESG and misvaluation measures * [J].
Bofinger, Yannik ;
Heyden, Kim J. ;
Rock, Bjoern .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2022, 134
[10]  
Bourgeois L. J., 1981, ACAD MANAGE REV, V6, P29, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2307/257138, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1981.4287985, 10.5465/amr.1981.4287985]