Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation

被引:415
作者
Beaulieu, Luc [1 ,2 ]
Tedgren, Asa Carlsson [3 ,4 ]
Carrier, Jean-Francois [5 ,6 ]
Davis, Stephen D. [7 ,8 ]
Mourtada, Firas [9 ]
Rivard, Mark J. [10 ]
Thomson, Rowan M. [11 ]
Verhaegen, Frank [8 ,12 ]
Wareing, Todd A. [13 ]
Williamson, Jeffrey F. [14 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Radiooncol, Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Quebec City, PQ G1R 2J6, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Ctr Rech Cancerol, Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Quebec City, PQ G1R 2J6, Canada
[3] Linkoping Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Hlth Sci IMH, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Swedish Radiat Safety Author, SE-17116 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, CRCHUM, Dept Radiooncol, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
[6] Univ Montreal, Dept Phys, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med Phys, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[8] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[9] Christiana Care Hlth Syst, Helen F Graham Canc Ctr, Newark, DE 19899 USA
[10] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[11] Carleton Univ, Dept Phys, Carleton Lab Radiotherapy Phys, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[12] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, GROW, Dept Radiat Oncol MAASTRO, NL-6201 BN Maastricht, Netherlands
[13] Transpire Inc, Gig Harbor, WA 98335 USA
[14] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
brachytherapy; treatment planning; dose calculation; radiation transport; commissioning; dose scoring; heterogeneities; material assignments; DUAL-ENERGY CT; MONTE-CARLO CALCULATIONS; CONE-BEAM CT; BOLTZMANN-EQUATION SOLVER; EFFECTIVE ATOMIC-NUMBER; X-RAY ATTENUATION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRON-DENSITY; PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1118/1.4747264
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The charge of Task Group 186 (TG-186) is to provide guidance for early adopters of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for brachytherapy (BT) dose calculations to ensure practice uniformity. Contrary to external beam radiotherapy, heterogeneity correction algorithms have only recently been made available to the BT community. Yet, BT dose calculation accuracy is highly dependent on scatter conditions and photoelectric effect cross-sections relative to water. In specific situations, differences between the current water-based BT dose calculation formalism (TG-43) and MBDCAs can lead to differences in calculated doses exceeding a factor of 10. MBDCAs raise three major issues that are not addressed by current guidance documents: (1) MBDCA calculated doses are sensitive to the dose specification medium, resulting in energy-dependent differences between dose calculated to water in a homogeneous water geometry (TG-43), dose calculated to the local medium in the heterogeneous medium, and the intermediate scenario of dose calculated to a small volume of water in the heterogeneous medium. (2) MBDCA doses are sensitive to voxel-by-voxel interaction cross sections. Neither conventional single-energy CT nor ICRU/ICRP tissue composition compilations provide useful guidance for the task of assigning interaction cross sections to each voxel. (3) Since each patient-source-applicator combination is unique, having reference data for each possible combination to benchmark MBDCAs is an impractical strategy. Hence, a new commissioning process is required. TG-186 addresses in detail the above issues through the literature review and provides explicit recommendations based on the current state of knowledge. TG-43-based dose prescription and dose calculation remain in effect, with MBDCA dose reporting performed in parallel when available. In using MBDCAs, it is recommended that the radiation transport should be performed in the heterogeneous medium and, at minimum, the dose to the local medium be reported along with the TG-43 calculated doses. Assignments of voxel-by-voxel cross sections represent a particular challenge. Electron density information is readily extracted from CT imaging, but cannot be used to distinguish between different materials having the same density. Therefore, a recommendation is made to use a number of standardized materials to maintain uniformity across institutions. Sensitivity analysis shows that this recommendation offers increased accuracy over TG-43. MBDCA commissioning will share commonalities with current TG-43-based systems, but in addition there will be algorithm-specific tasks. Two levels of commissioning are recommended: reproducing TG-43 dose parameters and testing the advanced capabilities of MBDCAs. For validation of heterogeneity and scatter conditions, MBDCAs should mimic the 3D dose distributions from reference virtual geometries. Potential changes in BT dose prescriptions and MBDCA limitations are discussed. When data required for full MBDCA implementation are insufficient, interim recommendations are made and potential areas of research are identified. Application of TG-186 guidance should retain practice uniformity in transitioning from the TG-43 to the MBDCA approach. (C) 2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4747264]
引用
收藏
页码:6208 / 6236
页数:29
相关论文
共 203 条
[1]   A Monte Carlo study on the effect of seed design on the interseed attenuation in permanent prostate implants [J].
Afsharpour, Hossein ;
D'Amours, Michel ;
Cote, Benoit ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Beaulieu, Luc .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (08) :3671-3681
[2]   Tissue modeling schemes in low energy breast brachytherapy [J].
Afsharpour, Hossein ;
Landry, Guillaume ;
Reniers, Brigitte ;
Pignol, Jean-Philippe ;
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (22) :7045-7060
[3]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[4]   CALCULATION AND APPLICATION OF POINT SPREAD FUNCTIONS FOR TREATMENT PLANNING WITH HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS [J].
AHNESJO, A ;
ANDREO, P ;
BRAHME, A .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1987, 26 (01) :49-56
[5]   Dose calculations for external photon beams in radiotherapy [J].
Ahnesjö, A ;
Aspradakis, MM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (11) :R99-R155
[6]   CONE BEAM CT-BASED THREE-DIMENSIONAL PLANNING IN HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY FOR CERVICAL CANCER [J].
Al-Halabi, Hani ;
Portelance, Lorraine ;
Duclos, Marie ;
Reniers, Brigitte ;
Bahoric, Boris ;
Souhami, Luis .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (04) :1092-1097
[7]  
Alcouffe R. E., 1995, LA12969M LOS AL NAT
[8]   IONIZATION-CHAMBER DOSIMETRY FOR PHOTON AND ELECTRON-BEAMS - THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
ALMOND, PR ;
SVENSSON, H .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA-THERAPY PHYSICS BIOLOGY, 1977, 16 (02) :177-186
[9]   ENERGY-SELECTIVE RECONSTRUCTIONS IN X-RAY COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY [J].
ALVAREZ, RE ;
MACOVSKI, A .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1976, 21 (05) :733-744
[10]   The effect of patient inhomogeneities in oesophageal 192Ir HDR brachytherapy:: a Monte Carlo and analytical dosimetry study [J].
Anagnostopoulos, G ;
Baltas, D ;
Pantelis, E ;
Papagiannis, P ;
Sakelliou, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (12) :2675-2685