Social inequalities in mortality: changes in the relative importance of income, education and household size over a 27-year period

被引:50
作者
Rognerud, MA [1 ]
Zahl, PH [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, N-0403 Oslo, Norway
关键词
education; income; inequality; mortality; singles; trends;
D O I
10.1093/eurpub/cki070
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this paper was to measure socio-economic inequalities in mortality over a 27-year period, and estimate the simultaneous effects of education and income adjusted for changing proportions and potential confounders. Methods: Census data in 1970, 1980 and 1990 with information about income, educational level and household size were linked to mortality records at the individual level and analysed with absolute mortality rates, Poisson regression (univariate and multivariate) and Relative Index of Inequality (RII). Results: Mortality differences increased between income quartiles and educational groups as well as between singles and non-singles. RII between income quartiles increased from 1.6 to 3.6 for men and 1.7 to 2.7 for women while RII between the educational groups increased from 1.6 to 2.8 for men and 1.5 to 2.1 for women. However, RII derived from the adjusted multivariate regression analysis was 1.8 (men) and 1.9 (women) between the income groups in 1990 and 2.2 (men) and 1.7 (women) between the educational groups. In the 1990s current income was more important than previous income, and the rate ratios (RR) increased for groups dropping into the lowest income quartile between two censuses. Conclusion: Low education and single status have become relatively more important risk factors for mortality over time. Confounder effects of education and household size could partly explain the seemingly large increase in inequalities between income groups. Results may also indicate a stronger reverse causation (poor health causing low income) over time.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Healthy, wealthy, and wise? Tests for direct causal paths between health and socioeconomic status [J].
Adams, P ;
Hurd, MD ;
McFadden, D ;
Merrill, A ;
Ribeiro, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 112 (01) :3-56
[2]   Income and health: the time dimension [J].
Benzeval, M ;
Judge, K .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (09) :1371-1390
[3]  
BOJER H, 1995, SOSIALOKONOMEN, V7, P22
[4]  
Borgan J, 1996, YB POPULATION RES FI
[5]  
*CYT SOFTW CORP, 1999, EGR WIND VERS 2 0 3
[6]  
DAHL E, 1993, SOCIOLOGY HLTH ILLNE, V15, P447
[7]   Optimal indicators of socioeconomic status for health research [J].
Duncan, GJ ;
Daly, MC ;
McDonough, P ;
Williams, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (07) :1151-1157
[8]  
EPLAND J, 2001, 200261 SSB
[9]  
EPSINGANDERSEN G, 2002, WHY WE NEED NEW WELF
[10]   A note on the effect of unemployment on mortality [J].
Gerdtham, UG ;
Johannesson, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 22 (03) :505-518