Uncertainty quantification for reservoir geomechanics

被引:8
作者
Pereira, Leonardo Cabral [1 ]
Sanchez, Marcelo [2 ]
do Nascimento Guimaraes, Leonardo Jose [3 ]
机构
[1] Petrobras Petroleo Brasileiro SA, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil
关键词
Reservoir geomechanics; Epistemic uncertainty; Analytical solution; Non-probabilistic methods; Uncertainty quantification; REPRESENTATION; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gete.2016.11.001
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Geomechanics plays a critical role in oil and gas reservoir problems. One of the challenges related to reservoir geomechanics is that information about sediments and rock properties is generally very limited. Furthermore, these geomaterials are typically highly heterogeneous. Therefore, a formal framework for dealing with the uncertainties associated with this type of problem is much required. Uncertainty quantification can be performed either via probabilistic or non-probabilistic methods. The latter approach is generally better suited for handling epistemic (or reducible) uncertainties, which are the more usual in geomechanical reservoir problems. A non-probabilistic framework based on the evidence theory was adopted in this work for dealing with the uncertainties related to the material properties. The contribution focuses on how additional information can be incorporated in a consist fashion in the analysis to reduce the uncertainties. Two analytic solutions associated with typical reservoir geomechanics problems, such as the estimation of the fracture pressure and subsidence, were adopted as the case studies. These application cases shown that the evidence theory was able to reduce the uncertainties associated with these problems when additional information about material properties became available. Another advantage of the adopted framework is that experts' opinion related (for example) to the reliability of the experimental data gathered from different sources could be explicitly incorporated in the study. It is shown that this type of approach can be instrumental in assisting the decision-making process. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 84
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, MECH HYDRAULIC FRACT
  • [2] Ben-Haim Y., 2006, Academic
  • [3] A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming
    Byrd, RH
    Gilbert, JC
    Nocedal, J
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 2000, 89 (01) : 149 - 185
  • [4] An analytical expression for the determination of in situ stress state from borehole data accounting for breakout size
    Della Vecchia, G.
    Pandolfi, A.
    Musso, G.
    Capasso, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2014, 66 : 64 - 68
  • [5] UPPER AND LOWER PROBABILITIES INDUCED BY A MULTIVALUED MAPPING
    DEMPSTER, AP
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1967, 38 (02): : 325 - &
  • [6] Fenton Norman, 2012, Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks
  • [7] Geertsma J., 1966, 1 ISRM C
  • [8] MODELING THE PROPAGATION OF WATERFLOOD-INDUCED HYDRAULIC FRACTURES
    HAGOORT, J
    WEATHERILL, BD
    SETTARI, A
    [J]. SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1980, 20 (04): : 293 - 303
  • [9] A sampling-based computational strategy for the representation of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions with evidence theory
    Helton, J. C.
    Johnson, J. D.
    Oberkampf, W. L.
    Storlie, C. B.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 196 (37-40) : 3980 - 3998
  • [10] Competing failure risk analysis using evidence theory
    Helton, JC
    Oberkampf, WL
    Johnson, JD
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (04) : 973 - 995