The Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for Chronic Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by Guideline-Concordant Dual Comparative Medial Branch Blocks

被引:35
作者
Conger, Aaron [1 ]
Burnham, Taylor [1 ]
Salazar, Fabio [1 ]
Tate, Quinn [1 ]
Golish, Mathew [1 ]
Petersen, Russell [1 ]
Cunningham, Shellie [1 ]
Teramoto, Masaru [1 ]
Kendall, Richard [1 ]
McCormick, Zachary L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Div Phys Med & Rehabil, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
关键词
Low Back Pain; Zygapophyseal; Scoliosis; Lumbar; Chronic; Spondylolisthesis; PAIN INTENSITY; NEUROTOMY; DENERVATION; SUCCESS; SPINE;
D O I
10.1093/pm/pnz248
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives. Although the effectiveness of lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of zyga-pophyseal joint (z-joint)-mediated low back pain has been characterized, few studies have described outcomes in patients selected using a guideline-concordant paradigm of >= 80% pain relief with dual comparative medial branch blocks (MBBs). We investigated long-term treatment outcomes of patients selected according to this paradigm. Design. Cross-sectional cohort study. Methods. The medical records of 111 consecutive patients were reviewed; 85 met inclusion criteria. A standardized telephone survey was used to capture current numerical rating scale (NRS) and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reporting >= 50% reduction of index pain. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to explore associations between the primary outcome and covariates, including age, duration of pain, presence of scoliosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and >75% disc height loss. Results. At six to 12, 12-24, and >24months, 63.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41-85%), 65.6% (95% CI = 49-82%), and 44.1% (95% CI = 27-61%) of patients reported a >= 50% pain reduction (P = 0.170), respectively. At a minimum of six months, 70.6% of patients reported a pain reduction of two or more points (minimally clinically important change), and 54.1% reported a PGIC score consistent with "much improved" or better. Older age and a smaller Cobb angle were associated with a >= 50% pain reduction (P< 0.05). Conclusion. Lumbar medial branch RFA is an effective, durable treatment for a significant proportion of patients with recalcitrant lumbar z-joint pain when candidacy is determined by the guideline-concordant paradigm of >80% pain relief with dual comparative MBBs.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 909
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[31]   Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided medial branch block for the treatment of lower lumbar facet joint pain A retrospective comparative study [J].
Han, Seung Hoon ;
Park, Ki Deok ;
Cho, Kyoung Rai ;
Park, Yongbum .
MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (16)
[32]   One block too much? Pain outcomes for patients receiving one versus two medial branch blocks before thermal radiofrequency ablation [J].
Cadwell, Joshua B. ;
Gaballa, Mina A. ;
Jain, Shona ;
Patel, Shivam ;
Hesketh, Patrick ;
Adaralegbe, Adejuyigbe ;
Char, Steven ;
Kaufman, Andrew G. .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2025, 50 (06) :517-518
[33]   Comparative Evaluation of Intraarticular Facet Joint Injection Versus Medial Branch Block in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomised Controlled Study [J].
Anshul ;
Malhotra, Naveen ;
Kumar, Amit ;
Jyotsna ;
Rohilla, Kanika ;
Sinha, Neha .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)
[34]   Comparative Effectiveness of a One-Year Follow-Up of Thoracic Medial Branch Blocks in Management of Chronic Thoracic Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Active Controlled Trial [J].
Manchikanti, Laxmaiah ;
Singh, Vijay ;
Falco, Frank J. E. ;
Cash, Kimberly A. ;
Pampati, Vidyasagar ;
Fellows, Bert .
PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2010, 13 (06) :535-548