Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late?

被引:331
作者
Buser, Daniel [1 ]
Chappuis, Vivianne [1 ]
Belser, Urs C. [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Stephen [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Oral Surg & Stomatol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Reconstruct Dent & Gerodontol, Bern, Switzerland
[4] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Dent Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
GUIDED BONE REGENERATION; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDED CLINICAL PROCEDURES; SOFT-TISSUE RESPONSE; LONG-TERM STABILITY; OUTCOMES FOLLOWING IMMEDIATE; HEALED ALVEOLAR RIDGES; 4-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; CONTOUR AUGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/prd.12170
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Implant placement in post-extraction sites of single teeth in the esthetic zone has been a topic of great interest in the field of implant dentistry since 1990. Triggered by the development of guided bone regeneration, the concept of immediate implant placement became quite popular in the 1990s. In the past 12 years, however, the dental community has begun to focus increasingly on the esthetic outcomes of post-extraction implant placement and several studies indicated a significant risk for the development of mucosal recessions with immediate implants. Parallel with this, significant progress has been made in the understanding of tissue biology in terms of hard and soft tissue alterations post extraction, based on preclinical, clinical and radiological studies. This knowledge has helped better to understand the etiology of these esthetic complications with immediate implant placement. The present review first analyzes the various phases of the development of therapeutic strategies over the years for post-extraction implant placement in single tooth sites in the esthetic zone. It presents the current knowledge concerning the terminology with immediate, early and late implant placement, the risk factors for the development of esthetic complications, and the selection criteria for the various treatment options. In the second part, clinical recommendations are given, since a clinician active in this field of implant therapy can use all treatment options depending on the preoperative analysis including a 3D cone beam computed tomography. The selection criteria for all four treatment options are presented and documented with typical case reports to illustrate the current treatment approaches applied in daily practice. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 102
页数:19
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW [J].
ADELL, R ;
LEKHOLM, U ;
ROCKLER, B ;
BRANEMARK, PI .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06) :387-416
[2]   Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets [J].
Araujo, Mauricio G. ;
Sukekava, Flavia ;
Wennstroem, Jan L. ;
Lindhe, Jan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (06) :615-624
[3]   Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial [J].
Araujo, Mauricio G. ;
Costa da Silva, Joao Carlos ;
de Mendonca, Arthur Furtado ;
Lindhe, Jan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (04) :407-412
[4]   Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction.: An experimental study in the dog [J].
Araújo, MG ;
Lindhe, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :212-218
[5]  
Augthun M, 1995, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V10, P421
[6]  
Barzilay I, 1993, Int J Prosthodont, V6, P169
[7]  
Becker W, 1990, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, V10, P376
[8]  
Becker W.B., 1994, INT J ORAL MAXILLOFA, V9, P389
[9]  
Belser UC, 2009, J PERIODONTOL, V80, P140, DOI [10.1902/jop.2009.080435, 10.1902/jop.2009.080435 ]
[10]   Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Mokti, Muizzaddin ;
Chen, Chun-Jung ;
Weber, Hans-Peter ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. ;
Gallucci, German O. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (05) :560-566