Enhancing Conservation, Ecosystem Services, and Local Livelihoods through a Wildlife Premium Mechanism

被引:38
作者
Dinerstein, Eric [1 ]
Varma, Keshav [2 ]
Wikramanayake, Eric [1 ]
Powell, George [1 ]
Lumpkin, Susan [2 ,5 ]
Naidoo, Robin [1 ]
Korchinsky, Mike [3 ]
Del Valle, Christian [4 ]
Lohani, Shubash [5 ]
Seidensticker, John [6 ]
Joldersma, Dirk [7 ]
Lovejoy, Thomas [8 ,9 ]
Kushlin, Andrey [2 ]
机构
[1] World Wildlife Fund, Conservat Sci Program, US, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[2] World Bank Grp, Global Tiger Initiat, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[3] Wildlife Works Carbon LLC, Mill Valley, CA 94941 USA
[4] Althelia Climate Fund, L-1882 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[5] World Wildlife Fund, Eastern Himalayas Program, US, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[6] Smithsonian Inst, Natl Zool Pk, Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Washington, DC 20008 USA
[7] World Wildlife Fund, Macroecon & Policy Program, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[8] George Mason Univ, Environm Sci & Policy Program, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[9] Heinz Ctr Sci Econ & Environm, Washington, DC 20004 USA
关键词
community based conservation; landscape conservation; large mammals; PES; REDD - Reduction of Emissions for Deforestation and Degradation; species conservation; sustainable financing for conservation; wildlife premium mechanism; REDD+ GAME; BIODIVERSITY; DEFORESTATION; VALUATION; PAYMENTS; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01959.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We propose the wildlife premium mechanism as an innovation to conserve endangered large vertebrates. The performance-based payment scheme would allow stakeholders in lower-income countries to generate revenue by recovering and maintaining threatened fauna that can also serve as umbrella species (i.e., species whose protection benefits other species with which they co-occur). There are 3 possible options for applying the premium: option 1, embed premiums in a carbon payment; option 2, link premiums to a related carbon payment, but as independent and legally separate transactions; option 3, link premiums to noncarbon payments for conserving ecosystem services (PES). Each option presents advantages, such as incentive payments to improve livelihoods of rural poor who reside in or near areas harboring umbrella species, and challenges, such as the establishment of a subnational carbon credit scheme. In Kenya, Peru, and Nepal pilot premium projects are now underway or being finalized that largely follow option 1. The Kasigau (Kenya) project is the first voluntary carbon credit project to win approval from the 2 leading groups sanctioning such protocols and has already sold carbon credits totaling over $1.2 million since June 2011. A portion of the earnings is divided among community landowners and projects that support community members and has added over 350 jobs to the local economy. All 3 projects involve extensive community management because they occur on lands where locals hold the title or have a long-term lease from the government. The monitoring, reporting, and verification required to make premium payments credible to investors include transparent methods for collecting data on key indices by trained community members and verification of their reporting by a biologist. A wildlife premium readiness fund would enable expansion of pilot programs needed to test options beyond those presented here.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 23
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, NAM COMM CONS REV
[2]   Producer-Level Benefits of Sustainability Certification [J].
Blackman, Allen ;
Rivera, Jorge .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2011, 25 (06) :1176-1185
[3]   Pleiotropy and charisma determine winners and losers in the REDD+ game: all biodiversity is not equal. [J].
Collins, M. B. ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. ;
Macdonald, E. A. ;
Macdonald, D. W. .
TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (03) :261-266
[4]   Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation [J].
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Matson, Pamela A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9455-9456
[5]  
Dinerstein E., 2003, LAST UNICORNS NATURA
[6]   The fate of wild tigers [J].
Dinerstein, Eric ;
Loucks, Colby ;
Wikramanayake, Eric ;
Ginsberg, Joshua ;
Sanderson, Eric ;
Seidensticker, John ;
Forrest, Jessica ;
Bryja, Gosia ;
Heydlauff, Andrea ;
Klenzendorf, Sybille ;
Leimgruber, Peter ;
Mills, Judy ;
O'Brien, Timothy G. ;
Shrestha, Mahendra ;
Simons, Ross ;
Songer, Melissa .
BIOSCIENCE, 2007, 57 (06) :508-514
[7]  
Dinerstein Eric, 1999, P316
[8]   Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits [J].
Ebeling, Johannes ;
Yasue, Mai .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 363 (1498) :1917-1924
[9]   The value of biodiversity: Where ecology and economy blend [J].
Edwards, PJ ;
Abivardi, C .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1998, 83 (03) :239-246
[10]   Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth [J].
Estes, James A. ;
Terborgh, John ;
Brashares, Justin S. ;
Power, Mary E. ;
Berger, Joel ;
Bond, William J. ;
Carpenter, Stephen R. ;
Essington, Timothy E. ;
Holt, Robert D. ;
Jackson, Jeremy B. C. ;
Marquis, Robert J. ;
Oksanen, Lauri ;
Oksanen, Tarja ;
Paine, Robert T. ;
Pikitch, Ellen K. ;
Ripple, William J. ;
Sandin, Stuart A. ;
Scheffer, Marten ;
Schoener, Thomas W. ;
Shurin, Jonathan B. ;
Sinclair, Anthony R. E. ;
Soule, Michael E. ;
Virtanen, Risto ;
Wardle, David A. .
SCIENCE, 2011, 333 (6040) :301-306