Modulation transfer function and pupil size in multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses in vitro

被引:88
作者
Kawamorita, T
Uozato, H
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2288555, Japan
[2] Kitasato Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Orthopt & Visual Sci, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2288555, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.024
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between pupil size and the modulation transfer function (MTF) of a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in vitro and to predict the visual effects in vivo. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Kitasato University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kitasato, Japan. METHODS: A refractive multifocal IOL (Array SA-40N, Allergan) and a monofocal IOL (PhacoFlex SI-40NB, AMO) were evaluated using the OPAL Vector system and a model eye with a variable effective aperture. With effective pupil diameters of 2.1, 3.0, 3.4, 3.9, 4.6, 5.1, and 5.5 mm, the in-focus and defocus MTFs were measured in the multifocal and monofocal IOLs. RESULTS: With increases in effective pupil diameter, the far MTF progressively decreased at all spatial frequencies. In contrast, the near MTF began to increase at effective pupil diameter 2.1 mm, showed a peak at 3.4 mm, and decreased at diameters greater than 3.4 mm. The ratio of near MTF to far MTF showed an increase with larger effective pupil diameters and at lower spatial frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: With a zonal progressive multifocal IOL, the pupil size effected a trade-off between the far and near MTFs: The near MTF increased at the expense of the far MTF at large pupil sizes (effective pupil diameter >3.4 mm). To enhance near vision with a multifocal IOL, the desirable effective pupil diameter should be 3.4 mm or larger.
引用
收藏
页码:2379 / 2385
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Glenn Fry award lecture 2002: Wavefront sensing, ideal corrections, and visual performance [J].
Applegate, RA .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2004, 81 (03) :167-177
[2]   Influence of Stiles-Crawford apodization on visual acuity [J].
Atchison, DA ;
Scott, DH ;
Strang, NC ;
Artal, P .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2002, 19 (06) :1073-1083
[3]  
ATCHISON DA, 2000, OPTICS HUMAN EYE, P137
[4]   Theoretical and practical performance of a concentric bifocal intraocular implant lens [J].
Charman, WN ;
Murray, IJ ;
Nacer, M ;
O'Donoghue, EP .
VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (18) :2841-2853
[5]   Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation [J].
Dick, HB ;
Krummenauer, F ;
Schwenn, O ;
Krist, R ;
Pfeiffer, N .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (10) :1878-1886
[6]   Ocular dominance and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by intraocular lens implantation [J].
Handa, T ;
Mukuno, K ;
Uozato, H ;
Niida, T ;
Shoji, N ;
Minei, R ;
Nitta, M ;
Shimizu, K .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (04) :769-774
[7]   Correlation between pupillary size and intraocular lens decentration and visual acuity of a zonal-progressive multifocal lens and a monofocal lens [J].
Hayashi, K ;
Hayashi, H ;
Nakao, F ;
Hayashi, F .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (11) :2011-2017
[8]   OPTICAL-PERFORMANCE OF MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
VANDIJK, H ;
LANG, A ;
PORTNEY, V ;
WILLIS, TR ;
SUN, R ;
OKSMAN, HC .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (04) :413-422
[9]   High order wave aberration of eyes [J].
Howland, HC .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2002, 22 (05) :434-439
[10]   Cataract extraction with multifocal intraocular lens implantation - A multinational clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes [J].
Javitt, JC ;
Steinert, RF .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 107 (11) :2040-+