Challenges for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Algorithms in Solving Variable-length Problems

被引:0
作者
Li, Hui [1 ]
Deb, Kalyanmoy [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
来源
2017 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC) | 2017年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
GENETIC ALGORITHM; DECOMPOSITION; DESIGN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In recent years, research interests have been paid in solving real-world optimization problems with variable-length representation. For population-based optimization algorithms, the challenge lies in maintaining diversity in sizes of solutions and in designing a suitable recombination operator for achieving an adequate diversity. In dealing with multiple conflicting objectives associated with a variable-length problem, the resulting multiple trade-off Pareto-optimal solutions may inherently have different variable sizes. In such a scenario, the fixed recombination and mutation operators may not be able to maintain large-sized solutions, thereby not finding the entire Pareto-optimal set. In this paper, we first construct multiobjective test problems with variable-length structures, and then analyze the difficulties of the constructed test problems by comparing the performance of three state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Our preliminary experimental results show that MOEA/D-M2M shows good potential in solving the multiobjective test problems with variable-length structures due to its diversity strategy along different search directions. Our correlation analysis on the Pareto solutions with variable sizes in the Pareto front indicates that mating restriction is necessary in solving variable-length problem.
引用
收藏
页码:2217 / 2224
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] D2MOPSO: MOPSO Based on Decomposition and Dominance with Archiving Using Crowding Distance in Objective and Solution Spaces
    Al Moubayed, N.
    Petrovski, A.
    McCall, J.
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2014, 22 (01) : 47 - 77
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, P 5 C EVOLUTIONARY M
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, CMA EVOLUTION STRATE
  • [4] HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization
    Bader, Johannes
    Zitzler, Eckart
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 19 (01) : 45 - 76
  • [5] Unwanted Feature Interactions Between the Problem and Search Operators in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization
    Byers, Chad
    Cheng, Betty H. C.
    Deb, Kalyanmoy
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY MULTI-CRITERION OPTIMIZATION, PT I, 2015, 9018 : 19 - 33
  • [6] A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
    Deb, K
    Pratap, A
    Agarwal, S
    Meyarivan, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) : 182 - 197
  • [7] Deb K., 2001, 112 ETH ZUR COMP ENG
  • [8] A Review of Methodological Approaches for the Design and Optimization of Wind Farms
    Herbert-Acero, Jose F.
    Probst, Oliver
    Rethore, Pierre-Elouan
    Larsen, Gunner Chr.
    Castillo-Villar, Krystel K.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (11) : 6930 - 7016
  • [9] A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit
    Huband, Simon
    Hingston, Phil
    Barone, Luigi
    While, Lyndon
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2006, 10 (05) : 477 - 506
  • [10] Covariance matrix adaptation for multi-objective optimization
    Igel, Christian
    Hansen, Nikolaus
    Roth, Stefan
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2007, 15 (01) : 1 - 28