Teachers' Implicit Personality Theories About the Gifted: An Experimental Approach

被引:80
作者
Baudson, Tanja Gabriele [1 ]
Preckel, Franzis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trier, Dept Psychol, D-54286 Trier, Germany
关键词
giftedness; implicit personality theories; harmony hypothesis; disharmony hypothesis; STUDENTS; JUDGMENTS; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1037/spq0000011
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The implicit theories teachers hold about the gifted influence their perception of and behavior toward highly able students, thus impacting the latter's educational opportunities. Two persistent stereotypes about the gifted can be distinguished: the harmony hypothesis (gifted students are superior in almost all domains) and the disharmony hypothesis (giftedness implies maladaptive social behavior and emotional problems). The present study investigated whether teachers' implicit personality theories about the gifted are in line with the harmony or the disharmony hypothesis. Using an experimental vignette approach, we examined 321 prospective and practicing teachers' implicit personality theories (based on the big five personality framework) about students described along three dimensions (ability level, gender, and age, resulting in 8 different vignettes), controlling for teachers' age, gender, experience with gifted students, and knowledge about giftedness. Ability level had the strongest effect on teachers' ratings (partial eta(2) = .60). Students described as gifted were perceived as more open to new experiences, more introverted, less emotionally stable, and less agreeable (all ps < .001). No differences were found for conscientiousness. Gender and its interaction with ability level had a small effect (partial eta(2)s = .04 and .03). Thus, teachers' implicit personality theories about the gifted were in line with the disharmony hypothesis. Possible consequences for gifted identification and education are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 46
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 5 FACTOR MODEL PERSO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Funf-Faktoren-Fragebogen fur Kinder (FFFK) [five factor questionnaire for children]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1978, MAD GENIUS DEBATE
[4]   Validity of Big Five personality judgments in childhood: A 9 year longitudinal study [J].
Asendorpf, JB ;
Van Aken, MAG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2003, 17 (01) :1-17
[5]  
Baudson T. G., 2012, GIFTED STUDENTS SEEN
[6]   The Five-Factor Framing of Personality and Beyond: Some Ruminations [J].
Block, Jack .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2010, 21 (01) :2-25
[7]  
Copenhaver R.W., 1992, ROEPER REV, V14, P151, DOI [10.1080/0278319920955341, DOI 10.1080/0278319920955341]
[8]  
Costa PT., 1992, NEO PI R PROFESSIONA
[9]  
DAHME G, 1988, PSYCHOL ERZ UNTERR, V35, P188
[10]  
DeYoung C.G., 2011, The Cambridge handbook of intelligence, P711, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511977244.036