The behavioural constellation of deprivation: Causes and consequences

被引:239
作者
Pepper, Gillian V. [1 ]
Nettle, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Neurosci, Newcastle, NSW NE2 4HH, Australia
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
behaviour; delay discounting; evolution; extrinsic mortality; health; inequalities; personal control; socioeconomic status; temporal discounting; time perspective; NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIOECONOMIC DEPRIVATION; HIGHER DISCOUNT RATES; TIME PERSPECTIVE; LIFE-HISTORY; SOCIAL-CLASS; INCOME INEQUALITY; CHILDHOOD HEALTH; DELAYED REWARDS; BODY-MASS; EDUCATIONAL-DIFFERENCES;
D O I
10.1017/S0140525X1600234X
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Socioeconomic differences in behaviour are pervasive and well documented, but their causes are not yet well understood. Here, we make the case that a cluster of behaviours is associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), which we call the behavioural constellation of deprivation. We propose that the relatively limited control associated with lower SES curtails the extent to which people can expect to realise deferred rewards, leading to more present-oriented behaviour in a range of domains. We illustrate this idea using the specific factor of extrinsic mortality risk, an important factor in evolutionary theoretical models. We emphasise the idea that the present-oriented behaviours of the constellation are a contextually appropriate response to structural and ecological factors rather than a pathology or a failure of willpower. We highlight some principles from evolutionary theoretical models that can deepen our understanding of how socioeconomic inequalities can become amplified and embedded. These principles are that (1) small initial disparities can lead to larger eventual inequalities, (2) feedback loops can embed early-life circumstances, (3) constraints can breed further constraints, and (4) feedback loops can operate over generations. We discuss some of the mechanisms by which SES may influence behaviour. We then review how the contextually appropriate response perspective that we have outlined fits with other findings about control and temporal discounting. Finally, we discuss the implications of this interpretation for research and policy.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 247 条
[1]   [Commentary] TIME FOR A CHANGE OF PERSPECTIVE ON BEHAVIOUR CHANGE INTERVENTIONS? [J].
Adams, Jean .
ADDICTION, 2009, 104 (06) :1025-1026
[2]   Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: An empirical study [J].
Adams, Jean ;
Nettle, Daniel .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 14 :83-105
[3]   Time Perspective in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Smoking and Body Mass Index [J].
Adams, Jean ;
White, Martin .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 28 (01) :83-90
[4]   Biological ageing - A fundamental, biological link between socio-economic status and health? [J].
Adams, JM ;
White, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 14 (03) :331-334
[5]   The intergenerational transmission of inequality: Maternal disadvantage and health at birth [J].
Aizer, Anna ;
Currie, Janet .
SCIENCE, 2014, 344 (6186) :856-861
[6]  
ANDERSEN ES, 1994, LECT NOTES PURE APPL, V156, P1
[7]   Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Sprenger, Charles .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) :3357-3376
[8]   Heritability of Delay Discounting in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Twin Study [J].
Anokhin, Andrey P. ;
Golosheykin, Simon ;
Grant, Julia D. ;
Heath, Andrew C. .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2011, 41 (02) :175-183
[9]  
[Anonymous], RUHR EC PAPERS
[10]  
[Anonymous], TIME PERSPECTIVE THE