Off-target movement assessment of dicamba in North America

被引:40
作者
Soltani, Nader [1 ]
Oliveira, Maxwel C. [2 ]
Alves, Guilherme S. [3 ]
Werle, Rodrigo [2 ]
Norsworthy, Jason K. [4 ]
Sprague, Christy L. [5 ]
Young, Bryan G. [6 ]
Reynolds, Daniel B. [7 ]
Brown, Ashli [7 ]
Sikkema, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Plant Agr, Ridgetown Campus,120 Main St East, Ridgetown, ON N0P 2C0, Canada
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Agron, 1575 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Dept Agron & Hort, North Platte, NE USA
[4] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop Soli & Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[5] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soli & Microbial Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[6] Purdue Univ, Dept Bot & Plant Pathol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[7] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soli Sci, Starkville, MS USA
关键词
Crop injury; dicamba-resistant soybean; primary drift; secondary drift; sensitivity; RAGWEED AMBROSIA-TRIFIDA; GLYPHOSATE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2020.17
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Six experiments were conducted in 2018 on field sites located in Arkansas, Indiana, Michigan, Nebraska, Ontario, and Wisconsin to evaluate the off-target movement (OTM) of dicamba under field-scale conditions. The highest estimated percentages of dicamba injury in nondicamba-resistant (DR) soybean were 55%, 44%, 39%, 67%, 15%, and 44% injury for non-covered areas and 55%, 5%, 13%, 42%, 0%, and 41% injury for covered areas during dicamba application in Arkansas, Indiana, Michigan, Nebraska, Ontario, and Wisconsin, respectively. The level of injury generally decreased as the downwind distance increased under covered and noncovered areas at all sites. There was an estimated 10% injury in non-DR soybean at 113, 8, 11, 8, and 8 m; and estimated 1% injury at 293, 28, 71, 15, and 19 m from the edge of treated fields downwind when plants were not covered during dicamba application in Arkansas, Indiana, Michigan, Ontario, and Wisconsin, respectively. Assessment of filter-paper collectors placed from 4 to 137 m downwind from the edge of the sprayed area suggested the dicamba deposition reduced exponentially with distance. The greatest injury to non-DR soybean from dicamba OTM occurred at Nebraska and Arkansas (as far as 250 m). Non-DR soybean injury was greatest adjacent to the dicamba sprayed area, but injury decreased with no injury beyond 20 m downwind or in any other direction from the dicamba sprayed area in Indiana, Michigan, Ontario, and Wisconsin. The presence of soybean injury under covered and noncovered areas during the spray period for primary drift suggests that secondary movement of dicamba was evident at five sites. Additional research is needed to determine the exact forms of secondary movement of dicamba under different environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 330
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BREASTFEED MED
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DUPONT FEXAPAN HERBI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, XTENDIMAX HERBICIDE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BASF HAS CREATED BET
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, TAVIUM PLUS VAPORGRI
[6]   Dicamba resistance: Enlarging and preserving biotechnology-based weed management strategies [J].
Behrens, Mark R. ;
Mutlu, Nedim ;
Chakraborty, Sarbani ;
Dumitru, Razvan ;
Jiang, Wen Zhi ;
LaVallee, Bradley J. ;
Herman, Patricia L. ;
Clemente, Thomas E. ;
Weeks, Donald P. .
SCIENCE, 2007, 316 (5828) :1185-1188
[7]   DICAMBA VOLATILITY [J].
BEHRENS, R ;
LUESCHEN, WE .
WEED SCIENCE, 1979, 27 (05) :486-493
[8]   Dicamba Losses to Air after Applications to Soybean under Stable and Nonstable Atmospheric Conditions [J].
Bish, Mandy D. ;
Farrell, Shea T. ;
Lerch, Robert N. ;
Bradley, Kevin W. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2019, 48 (06) :1675-1682
[9]   Inversion Climatology in High-Production Agricultural Regions of Missouri and Implications for Pesticide Applications [J].
Bish, Mandy D. ;
Guinan, Patrick E. ;
Bradley, Kevin W. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATOLOGY, 2019, 58 (09) :1973-1992
[10]  
Brabham C, 2019, 2019 WSSA ANN M NEW