Inverse engineering control in open quantum systems

被引:42
作者
Jing, Jun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Lian-Ao [2 ,3 ]
Sarandy, Marcelo S. [4 ]
Gonzalo Muga, J. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Dept Phys, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] Basque Fdn Sci, Ikerbasque, Bilbao 48011, Spain
[3] Basque Country Univ UPV EHU, Dept Theoret Phys & Hist Sci, Bilbao 48080, Spain
[4] Univ Fed Fluminense, Inst Fis, BR-24210346 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Basque Country Univ UPV EHU, Dept Phys Chem, Bilbao 48080, Spain
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW A | 2013年 / 88卷 / 05期
关键词
COMPUTATION;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.88.053422
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
We propose a scheme for inverse engineering control in open quantum systems. Starting from an undetermined time evolution operator, a time-dependent Hamiltonian is derived in order to guide the system to attain an arbitrary target state at a predefined time. We calculate the fidelity of our inverse engineering control protocol in the presence of the noise with respect to the stochastic fluctuation of the linear parameters of the Hamiltonian during the time evolution. For a special family of Hamiltonians for two-level systems, we show that the control evolution of the system under noise can be categorized into two standard decohering processes: dephasing and depolarization, for both Markovian and non-Markovian conditions. In particular, we illustrate our formalism by analyzing the robustness of the engineered target state against errors. Moreover, we discuss the generalization of the inverse protocol for higher-dimensional systems.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantum state engineering in hybrid open quantum systems
    Joshi, Chaitanya
    Larson, Jonas
    Spiller, Timothy P.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2016, 93 (04)
  • [2] Optimal Control for Open Quantum Systems: Qubits and Quantum Gates
    Roloff, R.
    Wenin, M.
    Poetz, W.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL NANOSCIENCE, 2009, 6 (08) : 1837 - 1863
  • [3] Effect of control procedures on the evolution of entanglement in open quantum systems
    Goyal, Sandeep K.
    Banerjee, Subhashish
    Ghosh, Sibasish
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2012, 85 (01):
  • [4] Robust quantum control in closed and open systems: Theory and practice
    Weidner, Carrie Ann
    Reed, Emily A.
    Monroe, Jonathan
    Sheller, Benjamin
    O'Neil, Sean
    Maas, Eliav
    Jonckheere, Edmond A.
    Langbein, Frank C.
    Schirmer, Sophie
    AUTOMATICA, 2025, 172
  • [5] Nonadiabatic quantum state engineering by time-dependent decoherence-free subspaces in open quantum systems
    Wu, Qi-Cheng
    Zhou, Yan-Hui
    Ye, Biao-Liang
    Liu, Tong
    Yang, Chui-Ping
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2021, 23 (11):
  • [6] Benefits of Open Quantum Systems for Quantum Machine Learning
    Olivera-Atencio, Maria Laura
    Lamata, Lucas
    Casado-Pascual, Jesus
    ADVANCED QUANTUM TECHNOLOGIES, 2023,
  • [7] Control of Quantum Systems
    Zoller, Peter
    THEORY OF THE QUANTUM WORLD, 2013, : 91 - 144
  • [8] Unpredictability and entanglement in open quantum systems
    Kazemi, Javad
    Weimer, Hendrik
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2023, 25 (09):
  • [9] COMPLEMENTARITY IN GENERIC OPEN QUANTUM SYSTEMS
    Banerjee, Subhashish
    Srikanth, R.
    MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2010, 24 (24): : 2485 - 2509
  • [10] Eigenstate tracking in open quantum systems
    Jing, Jun
    Sarandy, Marcelo S.
    Lidar, Daniel A.
    Luo, Da-Wei
    Wu, Lian-Ao
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2016, 94 (04)