Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates?

被引:73
作者
Miller, David I. [1 ]
Halpern, Diane F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Grad Sch Educ, Berkeley, CA 94607 USA
[2] Claremont Mckenna Coll, Dept Psychol, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
Spatial training; STEM education; Spatial skills; Gender differences; Gifted education; MENTAL ROTATION; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; MEMORY SPAN; ABILITY; VISUALIZATION; STRATEGY; ENHANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This one-year longitudinal study investigated the benefits of spatial training among highly gifted science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) undergraduates (28 female, 49 male). Compared to a randomized control condition, 12 h of spatial training (1) improved the skills to mentally rotate and visualize cross-sections of 3-D objects shortly after training, (2) narrowed gender differences in spatial skills shortly after training, and (3) improved examination scores in introductory physics (d=.38) but not for other STEM courses. After eight months, however, there were no training differences for spatial skills, STEM course grades, physics self-efficacy, or declared majors. Large gender differences, favoring males, persisted for some spatial skills, physics grades, and physics self-efficacy eight months after training. These results suggest that sustained exposure to spatially enriching activities over several semesters or years may be necessary to address gender gaps in spatial skills among highly gifted STEM undergraduates. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 152
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey [J].
Adams, W. K. ;
Perkins, K. K. ;
Podolefsky, N. S. ;
Dubson, M. ;
Finkelstein, N. D. ;
Wieman, C. E. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2006, 2 (01)
[2]  
Alias M., 2003, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, V2, P273
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, LEARN THINK SPAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL B IN PRESS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Am. Educ., DOI DOI 10.1037/A0016127
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, J. Eng. Educ., DOI [10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00278.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.1997.TB00278.X]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1939, Special Aptitude Test in Spatial Relations (MCT)
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Sex differences in cognitive abilitied
[9]   ENVIRONMENTAL INPUT TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN SPATIAL AND MATHEMATICAL ABILITY [J].
BAENNINGER, M ;
NEWCOMBE, N .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1995, 7 (04) :363-379
[10]  
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI